DID YOU HEAR WHAT I SAID?! A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF THE COMMENT LETTERS ON CHANGES IN SECTION 6 – MEASUREMENT OF CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK PROPOSED BY THE IASB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2016v8n2ID8634Abstract
This study aimed to investigate, through a content analysis of the comment letters sent to the IASB relating to Section 6 - Measurement of the "Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting" published in July 2013, the influence of the proposals by the various respondents on changes presented in the review of the Conceptual Framework published in May 2015. The analysis was done in two ways: how the proposals by the letters changed the version of the conceptual framework; and what changes in this framework are explicitly present in the letters received by the IASB. As result, it was noted that, in general, respondents supported the preliminary views about measurement, however, quite controversial issues were changed, for example, the complexity of the conceptual structure was significantly decreased in the current version, and also the numbers of measurement bases. Despite the above, only two of the four significant amendments in the 2015 version can be widely found in the letters-responses, what may indicate that others manners of contributions are also present, influencing changes in regulatory drafts.
Keywords: Comment Letters. Conceptual Framework. IASB. Measurement.
Downloads
References
ADHIKARI, Ajay; BETANCOURT, Luis; ALSHAMERI, Faleh. The SEC's Proposed IFRS Roadmap: An analysis of comment letters using content analysis and textual software. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 98-108, 2014.
ALALI, Fatima; CAO, Lei. International financial reporting standards—credible and reliable? An overview. Advances in Accounting, v. 26, n. 1, p. 79-86, 2010.
ARMSTRONG, C. S.; BARTH, M. E.; JAGOLINZER, A. D.; RIEDL, E. J.. Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. The accounting review, v. 85, n. 1, p. 31-61, 2010.
BALL, Ray. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors. Accounting and business research, v. 36, n. sup1, p. 5-27, 2006.
BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 1995.
CHATHAM, Michael D.; LARSON, Robert K.; VIETZE, Axel. Issues affecting the development of an international accounting standard on financial instruments. Advances in Accounting, v. 26, n. 1, p. 97-107, 2010.
CRUZ, Claudia Ferreira da; FERREIRA, Araceli Cristina de Sousa; SZUSTER, Natan. Estrutura Conceitual da Contabilidade no Brasil: Percepção dos Docentes dos Programas de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Ciências Contábeis. Pensar Contábil, v. 13, n. 50, p. 53-63, 2011.
FOGARTY, Timothy J.; HUSSEIN, Mohamed EA; KETZ, J. Edward. Political aspects of financial accounting standard setting in the USA. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 7, n. 4, p. 24-46, 1994.
GEORGIOU, George. The IASB standard-setting process: Participation and perceptions of financial statement users. The British Accounting Review, v. 42, n. 2, p. 103-118, 2010.
HOLDER, A. D., KARIM, K. E.; LIN, K. J.; WOODS, M. A content analysis of the comment letters to the FASB and IASB: Accounting for contingencies. Advances in Accounting, v. 29, n. 1, p. 134-153, 2013.
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB) (2013). A review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: discussion paper, July, 2013. Disponível em: <http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/Discussion-Paper-July-2013/Pages/Discussion-Paper-and-Comment-letters.aspx>. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2015.
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB) (2015). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Retrieved June 23, 2015, from http:// http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/Pages/Conceptual-Framework-Summary.aspx.
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB) (2015b). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting: basis for conclusions, May, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/Documents/May%202015/Basis-to-ED_CF_MAY%202015.pdf >. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2015.
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (IASB) (2014). Project Conceptual Framework: paper topic feedback summary: user outreach. March, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Conceptual-Framework/Pages/Conceptual-Framework-Summary.aspx>. Acesso em: 27 jun. 2015.
LA PORTA, Rafael; DE-SILANES, Florencio Lopez; SHLEIFER, Andrei. The Economic Conseguences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature, v. 46, n. 2, p. 285-332, 2008.
THE INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS COMMITTEE FOUNDATION (IASCF). 2010. Due process handbook. Retrieved June 19, 2015, from http://www.ifrs.org/Current-Projects/IASB-Projects/Annual-Improvements/ED-May-2012/Documents/DueProcessIASB2011.pdf.
WHITTINGTON, Geoffrey. Harmonisation or discord? The critical role of the IASB conceptual framework review. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, v. 27, n. 6, p. 495-502, 2008.
YEN, Alex C.; HIRST, D. Eric; HOPKINS, Patrick E. A content analysis of the comprehensive income exposure draft comment letters. Research in Accounting Regulation, v. 19, p. 53-79, 2007.
ZEFF, Stephen A. The Evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the Challenges it Faces. The Accounting Review, v. 87, n. 3, p. 807-837, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.