Exceso de confianza y honorarios de auditoría: ¿influye el consejo fiscal en esta relación?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2022v14n2ID24241Palabras clave:
Contabilidad del comportamiento, Toma de decisiones, CEO, Riesgo materialResumen
Objetivo: Este estudio tiene como objetivo investigar el papel del consejo fiscal como un mecanismo capaz de cambiar la capacidad del administrador para influir en los costos de auditoría.
Metodología: se analizaron 231 observaciones de empresas públicas que cotizaron sus acciones en [B] ³ en 2017. Para investigar la relación objeto de este estudio se realizó un análisis mediante regresión lineal múltiple con un estimador MCO.
Resultados: En la muestra analizada, se identificó que el exceso de confianza de los gerentes aumenta los costos de auditoría, lo cual es consistente con el argumento de que el exceso de confianza de los gerentes puede incrementar el riesgo de error material. Sin embargo, posiblemente por las características del entorno emergente o los diferentes niveles de eficiencia del consejo fiscal, no fue posible confirmar la hipótesis de que el consejo fiscal ejerce una influencia significativa en la relación entre el exceso de confianza de los administradores y los costos de auditoría.
Contribuciones del Estudio: En el campo empírico, esta investigación otorga subsidios a inversionistas y reguladores sobre el rol de los mecanismos de gobernanza - más específicamente el consejo fiscal - en la relación entre el auditor y el cliente. Desde una perspectiva teórica, la literatura contable se agrega para llenar el vacío existente sobre las consecuencias de los sesgos de comportamiento de los gerentes sobre el costo de auditoría bajo la moderación del consejo de supervisión.
Descargas
Citas
Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor Selection and Audit Committee Characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.47
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). The Association between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.17
Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165410104000394
Baioco, V. G., & Almeida, J. E. F. de. (2017). Efeitos do comitê de auditoria e do conselho fiscal na qualidade da informação contábil no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28(74), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201703250
Bell, T. B., Landsman, W. R., & Shackelford, D. A. (2001). Auditors’ Perceived Business Risk and Audit Fees: Analysis and Evidence. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1475-679X.00002
Ben-David, I., Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2013). Managerial Miscalibration*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1547–1584. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt023
Beneish, M. D. (1999). Incentives and Penalties Related to Earnings Overstatements that Violate GAAP. The Accounting Review, 74(4), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.4.425
Bergstresser, D., & Philippon, T. (2006). CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of financial economics, 80(3), 511–529.
Borges, V. P., Nardi, P. C. C., & da Silva, R. L. M. (2017). Determinantes dos Honorários de Auditoria das Empresas Brasileiras de Capital Aberto. Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 20(2), 216–230.
Castro, W. B. de L., Peleias, I. R., & Silva, G. P. da. (2015). Determinantes dos honorários de auditoria: Um estudo nas empresas listadas na BM&FBovespa, Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 26(69), 261–273.
Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (2014). Irregularidades contábeis na elaboração das demonstrações financeiras. Recuperado em 23 de agosto de 2021, de http://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/sancionadores/sancionador/2018/20180327_PAS_RJ20147072.html.
Chaney, P. K., & Philipich, K. L. (2002). Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1221–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00087
Chen, G., Crossland, C., & Luo, S. (2015). Making the same mistake all over again: CEO overconfidence and corporate resistance to corrective feedback. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1513–1535.
Cohen, J. R., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2014). The Effect of Audit Committee Industry Expertise on Monitoring the Financial Reporting Process. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50585
Cormier, D., Lapointe-Antunes, P., & Magnan, M. (2016). CEO power and CEO hubris: A prelude to financial misreporting? Management Decision, 54(2), 522–554. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2015-0122
Davidson III, W. N., Jiraporn, P., & DaDalt, P. (2006). Causes and consequences of audit shopping: An analysis of auditor opinions, earnings management, and auditor changes. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 69–87.
Davidson, R., Dey, A., & Smith, A. (2015). Executives’ “off-the-job” behavior, corporate culture, and financial reporting risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.07.004
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit research after sarbanes-oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(s-1), 5–30.
DeFond, M. L., Lim, C. Y., & Zang, Y. (2015). Client Conservatism and Auditor-Client Contracting. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51150
DuCharme, L. L., Malatesta, P. H., & Sefcik, S. E. (2004). Earnings management, stock issues, and shareholder lawsuits. Journal of Financial Economics, 71(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00182-X
Duellman, S., Hurwitz, H., & Sun, Y. (2015). Managerial overconfidence and audit fees. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 11(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2015.05.001
Eissa, A. M. K. (2020). Auditor’s perceptions of CEOs overconfidence in Egypt: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 6(2), 1-30.
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The Relation between Auditors’ Fees for Nonaudit Services and Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 71–105. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.71
Gaio, C., & Raposo, C. C. (2014). Corporate governance and earnings quality: International evidence. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14(3), 52.
Greiner, A., Kohlbeck, M. J., & Smith, T. J. (2016). The relationship between aggressive real earnings management and current and future audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(1), 85–107.
Hallak, R. T. P., & da Silva, A. L. C. (2012). Determinantes das despesas com serviços de auditoria e consultoria prestados pelo auditor independente no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 23(60), 223–231.
Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit Fees: A Meta-analysis of the Effect of Supply and Demand Attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191. https://doi.org/10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
He, X., Pittman, J. A., Rui, O. M., & Wu, D. (2017). Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality? The Accounting Review, 92(5), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51696
Hossain, S., Yazawa, K., & Monroe, G. S. (2017). The Relationship between Audit Team Composition, Audit Fees, and Quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(3), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51682
Hribar, P., KIM, J., Wilson, R., & Yang, H. I.-H. (2013). Counterparty responses to managerial overconfidence. Research Collection School Of Accountancy. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soa_research/1233
Hribar, P., & Yang, H. (2016). CEO overconfidence and management forecasting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 204–227.
Hsieh, T., Bedard, J. C., & Johnstone, K. M. (2014). CEO Overconfidence and Earnings Management During Shifting Regulatory Regimes. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(9-10), 1243-1268. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jbfa.12089
Huang, H.-W., Rose-Green, E., & Lee, C.-C. (2012). CEO Age and Financial Reporting Quality. Accounting Horizons, 26(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50268
Judd, J. S., Olsen, K. J., & Stekelberg, J. (2017). How do auditors respond to CEO narcissism? Evidence from external audit fees. Accounting Horizons, 31(4), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51810
Kim, J.-B., Wang, Z., & Zhang, L. (2016). CEO Overconfidence and Stock Price Crash Risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1720–1749. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12217
Kim, K., Mauldin, E., & Patro, S. (2014). Outside directors and board advising and monitoring performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2–3), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.02.001
Klein, A. (2002). Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9
Kothari, S. P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2012). Managing for the moment: The role of real activity versus accruals earnings management in SEO valuation. Working paper.
Krishnan, J., Wen, Y., & Zhao, W. (2011). Legal Expertise on Corporate Audit Committees and Financial Reporting Quality. The Accounting Review, 86(6), 2099–2130. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10135
Lee, H. S. (Grace), Li, X., & Sami, H. (2015). Conditional Conservatism and Audit Fees. Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50928
Lei nº 6.404, de 15 de dezembro de 1976. Dispõe sobre as Sociedades por Ações. Brasília, DF. Recuperado em 23 de agosto de 2021, de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6404consol.htm.
Lisic, L. L., Neal, T. L., Zhang, I. X., & Zhang, Y. (2016). CEO power, internal control quality, and audit committee effectiveness in substance versus in form. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 1199-1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12177
Lyon, J. D., & Maher, M. W. (2005). The Importance of Business Risk in Setting Audit Fees: Evidence from Cases of Client Misconduct. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(1), 133-151. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00165.x
Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The journal of finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.
Memis, M. U., & Cetenak, E. H. (2012). Earnings management, audit quality and legal environment: An international comparison. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2(4), 460.
Mitra, S., Jaggi, B., & Al-Hayale, T. (2019). Managerial overconfidence, ability, firm-governance and audit fees. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 52(3), 841–870.
Peni, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2010). Female executives and earnings management. Managerial Finance. 36 (7), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351011050343
Pompian, M. M. (2011). Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build investment strategies that account for investor biases (Vol. 667). John Wiley & Sons.
Procianoy, J. L., & Decourt, R. F. (2014). The Brazilian Fiscal Council—Protecting Minority Shareholders in a Weak Legal System. In S. Boubaker & D. K. Nguyen, Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (p. 159–180). WORLD SCIENTIFIC. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814520386_0006
Schelleman, C., & Knechel, W. R. (2010). Short-Term Accruals and the Pricing and Production of Audit Services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.221
Schrand, C. M., & Zechman, S. LC. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 311-329.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165410111000644
Sutrisno, P. (2019). CEO Overconfidence, Audit Firm Size, Real Earnings Management and Audit Opinion. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 23, 1-13.
Trapp, A. C. G. (2009). A relação do conselho fiscal como componente de controle no gerenciamento de resultados contábeis. Tese de Doutorado, Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Recuperado de https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/12/12136/tde-08072009-160920/pt-br.php
Yu, C. F. (2014). CEO overconfidence, CEO compensation, and earnings manipulation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 167-193. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50722
Zaman, M., Hudaib, M., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Corporate Governance Quality, Audit Fees and Non-Audit Services Fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(1–2), 165–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02224.x
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con la obra simultáneamente licenciada bajo Creative Commons que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de autoría de la obra y publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo: publicar en repositorio institucional o publicarlo como capítulo de un libro), con el reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo on line (por ejemplo: en repositorios institucionales o en su página web), ya que esto puede generar alteraciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.