Perception of organizational justice regarding the asymmetrical remuneration of employees of an organization in the electrical energy sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2025v17n2ID40766Palabras clave:
Remuneration systems. Organizational justice. Remuneration asymmetry.Resumen
Purpose: This study sought to verify the perception of employees of an organization in the electric power sector regarding organizational justice regarding remuneration asymmetry. Three dimensions of organizational justice were considered for analysis purposes: distributive, procedural and interactional justice.
Methodology: Descriptive research, applied through a questionnaire made possible by the Google Forms platform, whose final sample totaled 219 respondents. For data analysis, Mann-Whitney U statistical tests and Homogeneity Analysis (HOMALS) were used.
Findings: The main results indicate that the asymmetry of remuneration can negatively impact the perception of distributive justice in the organization. They still show little relationship with procedural justice and divergences in relation to interactional justice.
Contributions of the Study: Thus, it contributes theoretically and empirically by verifying that the asymmetry of remuneration can increase the feeling of injustice, provoke negative behaviors, and affect the performance at work of individuals. This study contributes to the advancement of research involving organizational justice and remuneration in the electricity sector.
Descargas
Citas
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic Press.
Al-Zu’bi, H. A. (2010). A study of relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction. International journal of business and management, 5(12), 102.
Assmar, E. M. L., Ferreira, M. C., & Souto, S. D. O. (2005). Justiça organizacional: uma revisão crítica da literatura. Psicologia: reflexão e crítica, 18(3), 443-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722005000300019
Barczak, A., Dembińska, I., Rostkowski, T., Szopik-Depczyńska, K., & Rozmus, D. (2021). Structure of remuneration as assessed by employees of the energy sector - multivariate correspondence analysis. Energies, 14(22), 7472. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en14227472
Beuren, I. M., Santos, V., Marques, L., & Resendes, M. (2017). Relação entre percepção de justiça organizacional e satisfação no trabalho. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.17524/repec.v11i0.1721
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Brasil. Decreto-lei nº 5.452, de 1° de maio de 1943. Aprova a Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1943. Recuperado em: https://www. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/Del5452compilado.htm
Cardoso, L. R. (2006). Avaliando sistemas de remuneração baseados em habilidades e competências: A visão dos profissionais de gestão de pessoas. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 8(21), 13-23.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(2), 278-321. http://dx.doi.org/1006/obhd.2001.2958
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of applied psychology, 86(3), 386.
Cropanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1989). Referent cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. Journal of applied psychology, 74(2), 293.
Cropanzano, R., Rupp, D. E., Gilliland, S., Steiner, D., & Skarlicki, D. (2002). Some reflections on the morality of organizational justice. Emerging perspectives on managing organizational justice, 225-278.
Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of management perspectives, 21(4), 34-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.27895338
Fávero, L. P.; Silva, F.; Belfiore, P.; & Chan, B. (2009). Análise de dados: modelagem multivariada para tomada de decisões. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro.
Gil, A.C. (2003). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 7ed. [2ª reimpressão]. Barueri-SP: Atlas.
Greenberg, J. (1987a). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of applied psychology, 72(1), 55.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of management, 16(2), 399-432.
Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Cropanzano, R. (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management; Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 79-103.
Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice, but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(2), 181-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01131.x
Guimarães, D. E. L., Soares, C. S., Zonatto, V. C. S, Santos, E. A., & Gonzaga, R. P. (2023). Efeitos da Justiça Organizacional na relação entre Consistência na Gestão de Desempenho e Engajamento no Trabalho. Estudios Gerenciales, 39(168), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2023.168.595
Homans, G. C. (1961). Its elementary form. Social Behavior, 488-531.
Klein, L., & Colauto, R. D. (2020). Percepção de justiça organizacional em contratos de incentivos e seu efeito na congruência entre objetivos pessoais e organizacionais. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 22, 582-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4066
Lacombe, F. J. M. (2020). Recursos Humanos: princípios e tendências. 3ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Langevin, P., & Mendoza, C. (2013). How can management control system fairness reduce managers’ unethical behaviours? European Management Journal, 31(3), 209-222.
Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In: K. Gergen; M. Greenberg; R. Willis (Orgs), Social exchange: advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum, p. 27-55.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science & Business Media.
Magnan, M., & Martin, D. (2019). Executive compensation and employee remuneration: The flexible principles of justice in pay. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3786-5
Martins, S. P. (2010). Direito do trabalho. Série Fundamentos jurídicos. 11ed. São Paulo: Atlas.
Mendes, A., Lunkes, R. J., Flach, L., & Kruger, S. D. (2017). The influence of remuneration on the behavior of hospital employees in Brazil. Contaduría y administración, 62(1), 207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2016.04.005
Mendonça, H., Pereira, C., Tamayo, A., & Paz, M. D. G. T. D. (2003). Validação fatorial de uma escala de percepção de justiça organizacional. Estudos Saúde e Vida, 30(1), 111-130.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of applied psychology, 76(6), 845-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845
Parker, R. J., & Kohlmeyer III, J. M. (2005). Organizational justice and turnover in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(4), 357-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.001
Prastiwi, D. (2019). The Effect of Perception of Justice Remuneration and Organizational Commitment Toward the Performance of Blu University in Inspectorate Region II. KnE Social Sciences, 295-312.
Raupp, F. &; Beuren, I. M. (2003). Metodologia da pesquisa aplicável às ciências sociais: Como elaborar trabalhos monográficos em contabilidade: teoria e prática, 3, 76-97.
Ribeiro, J. A., & Bastos, A. V. B. (2010). Comprometimento e justiça organizacional: um estudo de suas relações com recompensas assimétricas. Psicologia: ciência e profissão, 30, 4-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932010000100002
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wood Júnior, T., & Picarelli Filho, V. (1999). Remuneração Estratégica: a nova abordagem competitiva. São Paulo: Atlas.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
Los autores mantienen los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con la obra simultáneamente licenciada bajo Creative Commons que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de autoría de la obra y publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (por ejemplo: publicar en repositorio institucional o publicarlo como capítulo de un libro), con el reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores tienen permiso y son estimulados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo on line (por ejemplo: en repositorios institucionales o en su página web), ya que esto puede generar alteraciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
