Performance evaluation system to support the coordination of bidding processes management in a University Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n1ID23642Keywords:
Performance evaluation system; Bidding processes; Decision aiding; MCDA-C methodology.Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to structure a model to support the management of the Coordination of Bidding Processes at the Professor Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago University Hospital of Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (Federal University of Santa Catarina). The main purpose is to build, in its manager, knowledge about the management context, allowing the visualization of the aspects deemed as necessary and sufficient to be taken into account in this process.
Methodology: The Multicriteria Decision Aid - Constructivist (MCDA-C) methodology is used to structure a specific performance evaluation system considering the particularities of the context and its manager. Thus, the research uses a qualitative approach with primary data collection, in the form of a case study, based on interviews with the manager of the Coordination.
Results: The structuring of the system allows the development of a hierarchical structure of value and qualitative performance indicators. The development of performance indicators enables the effectively monitoring of activities developed by the sector, leading to efficient management and better application of public resources. It also allows the visualization of aspects at compromising, market and excellence levels, highlighting the relevant factors for management.
Contributions of the Study: The study contributes to filling the demonstrated gap based on the analysis of the literature on the topic. The system is considered to provide the manager with specific information to make decisions and promotes a discussion, not yet found in the literature, regarding the use of constructivist approaches for the bidding sector in a university hospital.
Downloads
References
Araújo, S. S., Matos, L. S., & Ensslin, S. R. (2020). Compras públicas sob a perspectiva da avaliação de desempenho: uma revisão de literatura e agenda de pesquisa. Revista Gestão e Conexões, 9(1), 99-127.
Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586-606.
Bortoluzzi, S. C., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., & de Almeida, M. O. (2017). Multicriteria decision aid tool for the operational management of an industry: a constructivist case. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(2), 165-182.
Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management Accounting Research, 11(3), 281-306.
Chaves, L. C., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S. R., & Bortoluzzi, S. C. (2020). Construção de modelo para apoiar o processo de desenvolvimento de um sistema de apoio à decisão. JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 17, e202017006. Epub November 13.
Chomchaiya, S., & Esichaikul, V. (2016). Consolidated performance measurement framework for government e-procurement focusing on internal stakeholders. Information Technology & People, 29(2), 354-380.
Eden, C. (1988). Cognitive mapping. European Journal of Operational Research, 36, 1-13.
Ensslin, L.; Dutra, A. & Ensslin, S. R. (2000). MCDA: a constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency. International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(1), 79-100.
Ensslin, L.; Montibeller, G. & Noronha, S. M. (2001). Apoio à decisão: metodologia para estruturação de problemas e avaliação multicritério de alternativas. Florianópolis: Insular.
Ensslin, S. R.; Ensslin, L.; Matos, L. S.; Dutra, A. & Ripoll-Feliu, V. M. (2015). Research opportunities in performance measurement in public utilities regulation. The International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64, 994-1017.
Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S., Dutra, A., Longaray, A., & Dezem, V. (2018). Performance assessment model for bank client's services and business development process: a constructivist proposal. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 11(1), 100-126.
Ensslin, L.; Mussi, C. C.; Ensslin, S. R.; Dutra, A. & Fontana, L. P. B. (2020a). Organizational knowledge retention management using a constructivist multi-criteria model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(5), 985-1004.
Ensslin, L.; Mussi, C. C.; Dutra, A.; Ensslin, S. R.; Demetrio, S. N. (2020b) Management Support Model for Information Technology Outsourcing. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 28(3), 123-147.
Franco-Santos, M., Kennerley, M., Micheli, P., Martinez, V., Mason, S., Marr, B., Gray, D. & Neely. A. (2007). Towards a Definition of a Business Performance Measurement System. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(8), 784-801.
Gardenal, F. (2013). A model to measure e-procurement impacts on organizational performance. Journal of Public Procurement, 13(2), 215-242.
Goh, S. C., Elliott, C., & Richards, G. (2015). Performance management in Canadian public organizations: findings of a multi-case study. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(2), 157-174.
Grzebieluckas, C., Buson, M. A., Queiroz, S. G., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S., Nickel, E., & Balbim, A. J. (2011). Instrumento para identificação das necessidades do consumidor no processo de desenvolvimento do design: Um estudo ilustrado com o projeto de um automóvel. Gestão & produção, 18(2), 337-350.
Igarashi, D. C. C., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., & Paladini, E. P. (2008). A qualidade do ensino sob o viés da avaliação de um programa de pós-graduação em contabilidade: proposta de estruturação de um modelo híbrido. Rausp Management Journal, 43(2), 117-137.
IPSOS (2017). Global Trends: Brasil é o segundo país mais insatisfeito com serviço público. Retrieved from: https://www.ipsos.com/pt-br/global-trends-brasil-e-o-segundo-pais-mais-insatisfeito-com-servico-publico.
Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value focused-thinking: a path to creative decision-making. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Kim, S. W., Olivares, M., & Weintraub, G. Y. (2014). Measuring the performance of large-scale combinatorial auctions: A structural estimation approach. Management Science, 60(5), 1180-1201.
Kusterko, S., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., & Chaves, L. C. (2018). Gestão de perdas em sistemas de abastecimento de água: uma abordagem construtivista. Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental, 23(3).
Longaray, A., Ensslin, L., Ensslin, S., Alves, G., Dutra, A., & Munhoz, P. (2018). Using MCDA to evaluate the performance of the logistics process in public hospitals: the case of a Brazilian teaching hospital. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(1), 133-156.
Longaray, A. A., Ensslin, L., Dutra, A., Ensslin, S., Brasil, R., & Munhoz, P. (2019). Using MCDA-C to assess the organizational performance of industries operating at Brazilian maritime port terminals. Operations Research Perspectives, 6, 100-109.
Mardale, F. E. (2015). Performance in public procurement. Revista Academiei FortelorTerestre, 20(4).
Matos, L. S., Valmorbida, S. M. I., & Ensslin, S. R. (2018). Gestión y Evaluación de la Monitorización en el Sector de Auditoría Interna de una Universidad Federal Brasileña: Una Propuesta Constructivista. REICE: Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 16(3), 67-85.
Matos, L. S., Valmorbida, S. M. I., Martins, V. A., & Ensslin, S. R. (2019). Development of performance evaluation theme: A systematic analysis of the literature. Contextus: Revista Contemporânea de economia e gestão, 17(2), 63-97.
Matos, L. S., Ensslin, S. R. & Ensslin, L. (2019). A review on the Performance Measurement Systems life cycle elements. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 17(4), 939-959.
Navarro-Galera, A., Rodríguez, D. O., & Lopez Hernandez, A. M. (2008). Identifying barriers to the application of standardized performance indicators in local government. Public management review, 10(2), 241-262.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International journal of operations & production management, 15(4), 80-116.
Painel de Compras [Programa de Computador] (2018). Retrieved from: http://paineldecompras.planejamento.gov.br/QvAJAXZfc/opendoc.htm?document=PaineldeCompras.qvw&host=QVS@17-0112-b-ias04&anonymous=true.
Patrucco, A. S., Luzzini, D., & Ronchi, S. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of public procurement performance management systems in local governments. Local Government Studies, 42(5), 739-761.
Ren, Z., Kwaw, P., & Yang, F. (2012). Ghana's public procurement reform and the continuous use of the traditional procurement system: The way forward. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 2(1), 56-69.
Rendon, R. G. (2008). Procurement process maturity: Key to performance measurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 8(2), 200-214.
Reuter, C., Goebel, P., & Foerstl, K. (2012). The impact of stakeholder orientation on sustainability and cost prevalence in supplier selection decisions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(4), 270-281.
Rodrigues, A. P., Fernandes, M. L., Rodrigues, M. F. F., Bortoluzzi, S. C., da Costa, S. G., & de Lima, E. P. (2018). Developing criteria for performance assessment in municipal solid waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 748-757.
Rodrigues, K., Welter, L., Longaray, A., & Ensslin, S. (2020). Modelo multicritério para apoiar a certificação da qualidade nos portos catarinenses. Revista Eletrônica de Estratégia & Negócios, 13(0II), 52-83.
Rotchanakitumnuai, S. (2013). Assessment of e-procurement auction with a balanced scorecard. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(1), 39-53.
Schapper, P. R., Malta, J. N. V., & Gilbert, D. L. (2017). Analytical framework for the management and reform of public procurement. In International handbook of public procurement (pp. 119-136). Routledge.
Schiele, J. J. (2005). A tool for assessing the value contributed by public purchasing departments throughout various stages of competitive acquisition processes for consulting services. Journal of Public Procurement, 5(1), 73-85.
Srivastava, S. K., & Agrahari, A. (2017). Benchmarking approach to improve public procurement process. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(20), 58-67.
Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory os scales of measurement. Science, 103 (2684), 677-680.
Tillema, S., Mimba, N. P. S., & Van Helden, G. J. (2010). Understanding the changing role of public sector performance measurement in less developed countries. Public Administration and Development, 30(3), 203-214.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
