Association between earnings management and non-GAAP measures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2025v17n2ID37173Keywords:
Canonical correlation, Non-GAAP measures, Earnings qualityAbstract
Purpose: Investigate the association between Abnormal Book-Tax Differences (ABTD) and the measures Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) and Adjusted EBITDA, as reported by Brazilian publicly traded companies.
Methodology: Use of canonical correlation on data manually collected from Reference Forms regarding EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as well as information from financial statements needed to estimate ABTD, which were obtained from the Economatica® platform, analyzing the behavior of the variables during the period from 2012 to 2021.
Results: The study’s results reveal significant associations between the variables, highlighting that ABTD has a greater influence on EBITDA than on Adjusted EBITDA. This finding suggests that accounting and tax earnings management practices, which can be simultaneously captured in ABTD, go beyond mandatory financial information, making them not directly observable in the values disclosed by companies in measures such as EBITDA.
Contributions of the Study: The study contributes to the literature by demonstrating that ABTD can be used to jointly evaluate financial performance measures, revealing possible indications of earnings manipulation. The analysis of the association between ABTD and EBITDA alerts investors and other users to the need for caution when interpreting mandatory and voluntary information disclosed by companies. The study also paves the way for the development of more sophisticated models in future research, deepening the understanding of ABTDA’s influence on measures beyond EBITDA.
Downloads
References
Andrade, G. V., & Murcia, F. D.-R. (2019). Uma análise crítica sobre os ajustes adicionais considerados nas divulgações da medida não-GAAP “EBITDA ajustado” em relatórios de companhias listadas brasileiras. REPeC – Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 13(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v13i4.2412
Andrade, G. V., & Murcia, F. D.-R. (2022). EBITDA: Fatores determinantes da divulgação da medida não-gaap no mercado acionário brasileiro. RECFin – Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, 10(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2318-1001.2022v10n1.50526
Ávila, J. R. M. S., Costa, P. S., & Fávero, L. P. L (2017). Honorários de auditoria e book-tax differences. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 31(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v11i31.134473
Black, D. E., & Christensen, T. E. (2009). US managers’ use of ‘pro forma’ adjustments to meet strategic earnings targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3–4), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02128.x
Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., Taylor Joo, T., & Schmardebeck, R. (2017). The relation between earnings management and non-GAAP reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 750–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12284
Bouwens, J., de Kok, T., & Verriest, A. (2019). The prevalence and validity of EBITDA as a performance measure. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit, Tome 25(1), 55–105. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.251.0055
Brown, N. C. (2020). Tornando-se de capital aberto: os benefícios e as armadilhas das métricas não GAAP. REPeC – Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 14(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v14i2.2670
Brunozi, A. C., Jr. (2016). Os efeitos das book-tax differences anormais na qualidade dos resultados contábeis em empresas de capital aberto listadas no Brasil. Universidade Vale do Rio dos Sinos.
Brunozi, A. C., Jr., Kronbauer, C. A., Alves, T. W., & Martinez, A. L. (2019). Book-tax differences anormais e persistência dos resultados contábeis e tributários em empresas de capital aberto listadas no Brasil. Revista Universo Contábil, 15(1), 07–26. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2019101
Brunozi, A. C., Jr., Kronbauer, C. A., Martinez, A. L., & Alves, T. W. (2018). BTD anormais, accruals discricionários e qualidade dos accruals em empresas de capital aberto listadas no Brasil. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 15(35), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2018v15n35p108
Core, J. E. (2001). A review of the empirical disclosure literature: discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00036-2
Costa, P. de S. (2012). Implicações da adoção das IFRS sobre a conformidade financeira e fiscal das companhias abertas brasileiras [Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo]. Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/12/12136/tde-30032012-173043/
Doyle, J. T., Jennings, J. N., & Soliman, M. T. (2013). Do managers define non-GAAP earnings to meet or beat analyst forecasts? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.03.002
Dye, R. A. (2001). An evaluation of “essays on disclosure” and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 181–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00024-6
Fávero, L. P. L., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de análise de dados: estatística e modelagem multivariada com Excel®, SPSS® e STATA®. Elsevier.
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2011). Econometria básica (5th ed.). Bookman.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: a review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 405–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0
Heflin, F., & Hsu, C. (2008). The impact of the SEC’s regulation of non-GAAP disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2–3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.07.002
Instituto Brasileiro de Governança Corporativa. (2020). Remuneração dos Administradores (7th ed.). https://conhecimento.ibgc.org.br/Paginas/Publicacao.aspx?PubId=24170
International Accounting Standards Board. (2011). Use of underlying earnings and non-GAAP measures. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/meetings/2011/june/advisory-council/ac-0611-ap6.pdf.
Instrução CVM nº 527, de 04 de outubro de 2012. Dispõe sobre a divulgação voluntária de informações de natureza não contábil denominadas LAJIDA e LAJIR. http://www.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/instrucoes/inst527.html
Iudícibus, S., Martins, E., & Carvalho, L. N. (2005). Contabilidade: aspectos relevantes da epopéia de sua evolução. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 16(38), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772005000200002
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kistner, S. P., & Platt, O. A., Neto. (2023). Análise metodológica dos EBITDA incompatíveis divulgados pelas companhias listadas na B3: identificação das variáveis divergentes nas conciliações. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 15(2), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2023v15n2ID30732
Koubaa, R. R., & Anis, J. (2015). Book-tax differences: relevant explanatory factors. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 3(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijaes.v3i2.4717
KPMG. (2016). Divulgações contábeis 2016 – Um estudo sobre as políticas contábeis críticas, medições não contábeis e as modificações no relatório do auditor independente. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/br/pdf/2016/11/br-divulgacoes-contabeis-outubro-2016.pdf
Maragno, L. M. D., Borba, J. A., & Fey, V. A. (2014). Como as empresas mais negociadas no Bm&Fbovespa divulgam o EBITDA? Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ, 19(1), 58–79.
Marques, A. (2006). SEC interventions and the frequency and usefulness of non-GAAP financial measures. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-006-9016-x
Marques, A. (2017). Non-GAAP earnings: international overview and suggestions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(3), 318–335. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-04-2017-0140
Martinez, A. L., & Dalfior, M. D. (2015). Agressividade fiscal entre companhias controladoras e controladas. Revista da Receita Federal: estudos tributários e aduaneiros, 2(1), 344–362.
Martinez, A. L., & Silva, J. D. R. (2019). Agressividade fiscal de empresas brasileiras com transações entre partes relacionadas no exterior. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 9(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.18028/rgfc.v9i1.5767
Mey, M. T., & Lamprecht, C. (2021). The association between EBITDA reconciliation quality and opportunistic disclosure. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2020.1817268
Morais, H. C. B., & Macedo, M. A. da S. (2021). Relationship between earnings management and abnormal book-tax differences in Brazil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 32(85), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202009230
Nota explicativa à Instrução CVM n. 527 de 04 de outubro de 2012. Recuperado de https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/export/sites/cvm/legislacao/notas-explicativas/anexos/nota527.pdf
Pontes, G. A., Lemes, S., Silva, J. R. M., & Costa, P. de S. (2023). Book-tax differences anormal e a não conformidade na divulgação do EBITDA. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 17(e213704). https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2023.213704
Pronunciamento Técnico CPC nº 26 (R1), de 2011. Apresentação das demonstrações contábeis. https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/menu/regulados/normascontabeis/cpc/cpc.html
Resolução CVM nº 156, de 23 de junho de 2022. Dispõe sobre a divulgação voluntária de informações de natureza não contábil denominadas LAJIDA e LAJIR. https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/resol156.html
Rozenbaum, O. (2019). EBITDA and managers’ investment and leverage choices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 513–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12426
Sant’anna, V. S., & Brunozi, A. C., Jr. (2019). Governança corporativa, tmt e book-tax differences (btd) anormais em empresas de capital aberto listadas no Brasil. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 12(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.14392/ASAA.2019120209
Santos, D. G., & Oliveira, A. S. (2020). Agressividade fiscal e a lucratividade nas empresas do setor de energia elétrica do Brasil. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil, 19, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220203044
Scott, W. R. (2015). Financial Accounting Theory (7th ed.). Pearson.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Silva, J. R. M., Costa, P. S., & Santos, M. A. (2022). Corrupção dos países e book-tax differences anormal: uma análise multinível. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 16(34), e188514. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2022.188514
Tang, T., & Firth, M. (2011). Can book-tax differences capture earnings management and tax Management? Empirical evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting, 46(2), 175–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2011.04.005
Tang, T. Y. H. (2005). Book-tax differences, a proxy for earnings management and tax management - empirical evidence from China. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.872389
Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8
Zhang, H., & Zheng, L. (2011). The valuation impact of reconciling pro forma earnings to GAAP earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1–2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.07.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
