Excessive use of artificial intelligence in accounting undergraduate courses: risks of technological dependence on the development of analytical skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2026v18n2ID44502Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence; Analytical Skills; Accounting Education; Higher Education; Professional Ethics.Abstract
Purpose: To analyze students´ and lectures’ perceptions about the effects of the excessive use of Generative Artificial Intelligence among students enrolled in the Bachelor's Degree in Accounting Sciences at a public higher education institution.
Methodology: A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative and qualitative procedures. The quantitative approach was administered through structured questionnaires to 204 Accounting students, enabling the measurement of variables and the identification of statistical patterns using Pearson's correlation. The qualitative approach consisted of semi-structured interviews with accounting lectures, allowing and in-depth understanding of subjective perceptions regarding the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the teaching-learning process. This methodological combination enabled an integrated and consistent analysis of the impacts of the excessive use of such tools on academic training and the development of analytical skills essential to accounting practice.
Results: The analysis revealed significant associations between variables, including between the frequency of use of Generative Artificial Intelligence and the perceived impairment of intellectual autonomy, autonomy and risk to professional education, as well as between analytical reasoning and risk to professional education. Negative correlations were also observed between the clarity of institutional guidelines and variables such as autonomy, analytical reasoning and professional education. The interviews highlighted lecturers’ concerns regarding superficial learning and the loss of critical skills among students.
Study Contributions: The findings highlight the risks associated with the excessive use of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools, highlighting that, although they have the potential to support the learning process, their indiscriminate use can compromise the development of fundamental skills for accounting practice, requiring pedagogical interventions that encourage the conscious, critical, and responsible use of Artificial Intelligence within the university environment.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Alia, A., & Lestari, B. A. H. (2025). Revolutionizing the Accounting Curriculum: Optimizing Accountant Competencies through Data Technology, Blockchain, and Artificial Intelligence from the Perspective of Accounting Students at the University of Mataram in Industry 5.0. Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, 4(1), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajabm.v4i1.84
Alves, M. A., Silva, C. A. T., & Bonfim, M. P. (2024). ChatGPT e desonestidade acadêmica: percepção dos estudantes de contabilidade sobre o seu uso. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina. https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2024.e99115
Araújo, M. L. de. (2024). Perfil esperado do Contador no mercado de trabalho: uma análise da percepção dos empresários da área contábil [Undergraduate thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte].
Araujo, M. H. de, & Cornacchione, E. (2024). Reflexões sobre o uso de inteligência artificial na contabilidade gerencial: oportunidades, desafios e riscos. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2024.231688
Assis, C. F., & Monteiro, R. (2023). Metodologias qualitativas e quadros de referência para a pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais aplicadas. Revista JurES, 16(29), 1-28. https://estacio.periodicoscientificos.com.br/index.php/juresvitoria/article/view/1993/1627
Associação Brasileira de Mantenedoras do Ensino Superior (ABMES, 2024). Pesquisa Inteligência Artificial na Educação Superior. August 6. https://www.abmes.org.br/abmes-pesquisas/detalhe/54/inteligencia-artifical-na-educacao-superior
Azambuja, C. C. de, & Silva, G. F. da. (2024). Novos desafios para a educação na Era da Inteligência Artificial. Unisinos Journal of Philosophy, 25(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2024.251.07
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
Barbosa, M. R. (2022). O impacto da inteligência artificial na aprendizagem: desafios e possibilidades. Editora Educação.
Bertoni, N. (2024). Como a IA e automação estão transformando a gestão jurídica no dia a dia. https://sis-it.com/blog/como-a-ia-e-automacao-estao-transformando-a-gestao-juridica-no-dia-a-dia
Bishop, P. A., & Herron, R. L. (2015). Use and Misuse of the Likert Item Responses and Other Ordinal Measures. International Journal of Exercise Science, 8(3), 297–302. https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ijes/vol8/iss3/10/
Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 1-5. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol50/iss2/2/
Butson, R., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2024). AI and its implications for research in higher education: a critical dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2280200
Carr, N. (2011). A geração superficial: o que a internet está fazendo com os nossos cérebros. Rio de Janeiro: Agir.
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Chomsky, N. (2023). The false promise of Chat GPT. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/08/opinion/noam-chomsky-chatgpt-ai.html
Clason, D. L., & Dormody, T. J. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35.
Conselho Federal de Contabilidade (CFC, 2023). Norma Brasileira de Contabilidade NBC PG 12 (R4). https://cfc.org.br/normas-brasileiras-de-contabilidade/
Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ, 2024). O uso da inteligência artificial generativa no Poder Judiciário brasileiro: relatório de pesquisa. https://bibliotecadigital.cnj.jus.br/jspui/bitstream/123456789/976/1/CNJ_Relatorio_de_Pesquisa_IAG_PJ.pdf
Dalalah, D., & Dalalah, O. M. A. (2023). The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: The case of ChatGPT. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822
Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Front. Educ., 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(3), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., & Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401223000233
Ferrer, W. M. H., & Dias, J. A. (2023). Manual prático de metodologia da pesquisa científica: noções básicas. Universidade de Marília.
Ferreira, R. N., Rodrigues, B. D., Francisco, C. F., Lobão, D. L. A., & de Azevedo, P. L. P. (2023). Como a inteligência artificial impacta na vida dos estudantes de universidades públicas do Rio de Janeiro. Revista Tópicos, (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10348848
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.
Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., & Sarris, J. (2019). The "online brain": how the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13(9), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(11), 2599-2614. https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/13/11/181
Hirabayashi, S., Jain, R., Jurković, N., & Wu, G. (2024). Harvard Undergraduate Survey on Generative AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.00833
Holanda, S. S. de L., & Negreiros, M. C. V. (2024). Benefício ou malefício? Análise do impacto da inteligência artificial para os acadêmicos de Ciências Contábeis. Revista Sociedade Científica, (12), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.61411/rsc31879
Holmes, W., & Miao, F. (2025). Generative AI: Guidance for Education and Research Applications. UNESCO. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/7rfml54
Instituto de Auditoria Independente do Brasil (IBRACON, 2023). Relatório de Tendências da Contabilidade 2023. https://ibracon.com.br
International Federation of Accountants (IFAC, 2025). International Education Standard 3, Initial Professional Development – Professional Skills (Revised). https://www.ifac.org/publications/international-education-standards-2-3-and-4-revised
Ivanov, S. (2023). The dark side of artificial intelligence in higher education. The Service Industries Journal, 43(15-16), 1055-1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2258799
Keller, L. (2023). Devemos temer o uso da Inteligência Artificial na educação?. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. https://www.ufsm.br/2023/06/13/uso-da-inteligencia-artificial-na-educacao
Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X. H., Beresnitzky, A. V., & Maes, P. (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872
Lang, M. J. S. (2024). Impactos da Inteligência Artificial na contabilidade: uma análise do mercado da região central do Rio Grande do Sul. Saber Humano, 1(1), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.18815/sh.2024v1n1.681
Lem, P. (2023, November 22). Less than half of top universities publish AI guidelines. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/less-half-top-universities-publish-ai-guidelines
Lemos, D., Ribeiro, M., & Martins, C. (2021). A influência das tecnologias educacionais no desempenho acadêmico: um estudo com universitários. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 26, 1-18.
Losch, S., Rambo, C. A., & Ferreira, J. L. (2023). A pesquisa exploratória na abordagem qualitativa em educação. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 18, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v18i00.17958
Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students' work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963
Marôco, J. (2021). Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.
Mazalo, J. V., & Ramos, H. (2024). Metodologias de investigação científica. Revista Interdisciplinar em Educação e Pesquisa, 6(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.36732/riep.v6i2.398
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14.
Moreira, K. da S. (2024). Os principais impactos da inteligência artificial na contabilidade: uma avaliação dos benefícios, desafios e transformações no papel do profissional contábil na era digital [Monografia, Universidade do Estado da Bahia]. https://saberaberto.uneb.br/handle/20.500.11896/7526
Muawanah, U., Marini, A., & Sarifah, I. (2024). The interconnection between digital literacy, artificial intelligence, and the use of E-learning applications in enhancing the sustainability of Regional Languages: Evidence from Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101169
Leitão, M. (2024). A preocupação de um segmento com os riscos da inteligência artificial. Veja, September 3. https://veja.abril.com.br/coluna/matheus-leitao/a-preocupacao-de-um-segmento-com-os-riscos-da-inteligencia-artificial/
Oliveira, A. (2023). Entenda o que é Escala Likert e como aplicá-la na pesquisa. MindMiners, August 28. https://mindminers.com/blog/entenda-o-que-e-escala-likert/
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge.
Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandrić, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Araya, D., tesar, M., Mika, C., Chen, L., Wang, C., sturm, S., Rider, S. & Fuller, S. (2024). AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(9), 828-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437
Pinheiro, M. H. B., Costa, M. R. M., & Vitoriano, M. A. V. (2025). A interface entre inteligência artificial e letramento informacional no ensino superior: contextos, avanços e desafios inter e multidisciplinares. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 30, 1-15.
Pisica, A. I., Edu, T., Zaharia, R. M., & Zaharia, R. (2023). Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics. Societies, 13(5), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13050118
Popenici, S. (2023). The critique of AI as a foundation for judicious use in higher education. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.4
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Rodrigues, O. S., & Rodrigues, K. S. (2023). A inteligência artificial na educação: os desafios do ChatGPT. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.45997
Salgado, D. (2024). Amostragem por conveniência: o que é e como utilizar. https://blog.opinionbox.com/amostragem-por-conveniencia/
Santos, A. D. (2024). A Inteligência Artificial Generativa e o avanço social: um exercício sobre os efeitos na produtividade do trabalho. Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa. https://repositorio.ual.pt/bitstreams/d326b318-be3e-4d9b-9338-8d5ed76bdf5e/download
Scarfe, P., Watcham, K., Clarke, A., & Roesch, E. (2024). A real-world test of artificial intelligence infiltration of a university examinations system: A “Turing Test” case study. Plos One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305354
Severino, C., & Silva, D. M. da. (2024). Characteristics associated with the development of hard and soft skills in accounting. Journal Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 17(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2024170206
Slimi, Z., & Carballido, B. V. (2023). Navigating the Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: An Analysis of Seven Global AI Ethics Policies. TEM Journal, 12(2), 590-602. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122
Soares, F., Rosa, R., & Soutes, D. (2023). Competências e habilidades necessárias para a atuação do profissional contábil. Ciências Sociais Aplicadas em Revista, 25(45), 150–178. https://doi.org/10.48075/csar.v25i45.31588
Sousa, A. (2019). Coeficiente de correlação de Pearson e coeficiente de correlação de Spearman. O que medem e em que situações devem ser utilizados?. Correio dos Açores: Matemática, March 21. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/5365
Sousa, A. E., & Cardoso, P. (2025). Uso de IA Generativa por Estudantes do Ensino Superior. Eletrônica, 14(7), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14071258
Souza, L. H. R., Cardoso, B. L. C., & Nunes, C. P. (2024). Análise de dados quantitativos na educação. Editora Omnis Scientia. https://editora.editoraomnisscientia.com.br/livroPDF/268-05728245641-18092024173948.pdf
Pitts, G., Marcus, V., & Motamedi, S. (2025). Student Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of AI in Education. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02198
Theóphilo, C. R. (2023). Integração das abordagens quantitativa e qualitativa: ensaio sobre métodos mistos na pesquisa em Contabilidade. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 17, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2023.221846
Tuzzo, S. A., Santos, I. G., & Braga, C. F. (2024). O caráter dialógico da pesquisa qualitativa. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 19, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.19.2023.e864
Organização das Nações Unidas pra a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura (UNESCO, 2024). Guia para a IA generativa na educação e na pesquisa. ISBN: 978-92-3-700028-1. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000390241
World Economic Forum (2025). The Future of Jobs Report 2025. January 7. Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Smith, C., Hattingh, M., & Matthee, M. (2024, October). Effects of Generative Chatbots in Higher Education. Information, 14(9), 492. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/14/9/492
Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023a). Augmented intelligence in programming learning: Examining student views on the use of ChatGPT for programming learning. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100005
Zelaya-Guzmán, A. G., Flores-Jara, P. M., Ortega-Pardo, S., & García-Coca, R. (2024). Percepción y uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación Superior: correlación con el rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. YUYAY: Estrategias, Metodologías & Didácticas Educativas, 4(1), 100–120.
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Cowling, M. (2023). An innovative tool for education: An adversarial dialogue system embedded with humor, empathy and culture. International Conference on Information And Education Technology. [https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIET56899.2023.10111118]
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(34), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)