Minimalism and the Pragmatic Frame
Keywords:
Semantic minimalism, Minimal propositions, Occasionalism, Pragmatic frame, theAbstract
In the debate between literalism and contextualism in semantics, Kent Bach’s project is often taken to stand on the latter side of the divide. In this paper I argue this is a misleading assumption and justify it by contrasting Bach’s assessment of the theoretical eliminability of minimal propositions arguably expressed by well-formed sentences with standard minimalist views, and by further contrasting his account of the division of interpretative processes ascribable to the semantics and pragmatics of a language with a parallel analysis carried out by the most radical opponent to semantic minimalism, i.e., by occasionalism. If my analysis proves right, the sum of its conclusions amounts to a refusal of Bach’s main dichotomies.
Downloads
References
AUSTIN, J. L. Truth. In: AUSTIN, J. L. Philosophical Papers. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1950. p. 117-133.
BACH, K. Conversational Impliciture. Mind and Language, 9, 1994, p. 124-162.
BACH, K. The Semantic-Pragmatics Distinction: What it is and why it matters. In: TURNER, Ken. (Ed.). The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from different points of view. Elsevier: Oxford, 1999a. p. 65-84.
BACH, K. The Myth of Conventional Implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy, v. 22, n. 4, 1999[b], p. 327-366.
BACH, K. You don’t say? Synthèse, 128, 2001, p. 15-44.
BACH, K. Context ex-machina. In: SZABÓ, Z. (Ed.). Semantics vs. Pragmatics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005. p. 15-44.
BORG, E. Minimalism versus contextualism in semantics. In: PREYER, G.; PETER, G. (Ed.). Context sensitivity and semantic minimalism: essays on semantics and pragmatics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
CAPPELEN, H.; LEPORE, E. Insensitive Semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 2005a.
CAPPELEN, H.; LEPORE, E. A Tall Tale: in Defence of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. In: PREYER, G.; PETER, G. (Ed.). Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005b. p. 197-220.
DAVIDSON, D. Truth and Meaning. In: DAVIDSON, D. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. p. 17-40.
GRICE, P. Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge; London: Harvard University Press, 1989.
GARCÍA-CARPINTERO, M. Recanati on the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Crítica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía. v. 38, n. 112, 2006, p. 35-68.
KALISH, D. Semantics. In: EDWARDS, P. (Ed.). The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan, 1967. Vol. X, p. 348-358.
KAPLAN, D. Demonstratives: an essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives. In: ALMOG, J.; PERRY, J.; WETTSTEIN, H. (Ed.). Themes from Kaplan. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. 1989. p. 481-563
LEWIS, D. General Semantics. Synthèse, 22, 1970, p. 18-67.
RECANATI, F. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
RECANATI, F. Literalism and Contextualism: Some Varieties. In: PREYER, G.; PETER, G. (Ed.). Contextualism in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. p. 171-196.
TRAVIS, C. Insensitive Semantics. Mind and Language, 21, 2006, p. 39-49.
TRAVIS, C. Occasion-Sensitivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.