O Voluntarismo de Van Fraassen

Anarquia Epistêmica ou Irracionalismo Científico

Autores/as

  • Bruno Malavolta e Silva UFRGS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n63ID29583

Palabras clave:

Posturas Epistêmicas, Relativismo, Van Fraassen, The Empirical Stance, Voluntarismo

Resumen

Em The Empirical Stance, van Fraassen propõe o voluntarismo de posturas epistêmicas: é racional tudo o que é racionalmente permitido, e apenas a incoerência é racionalmente proibida. O voluntarismo de posturas é uma concepção permissiva de racionalidade, que permite a um agente escolher qual postura epistêmica adotar, onde uma postura epistêmica é entendida como um feixe de atitudes avaliativas (e.g. admirar, priorizar) acerca de como formar conhecimento. A vantagem proclamada pelo voluntarismo é a sua capacidade para explicar a racionalidade de revoluções científicas: a aceitação de novos paradigmas não decorre do seguimento de regras metodológicas fixas, mas expressa uma escolha de aderir a um novo sistema de valores e posturas epistêmicas. Defendo que o voluntarismo enfrenta um dilema entre duas situações insatisfatórias: ou assume o conservadorismo epistêmico (i.e. que nossas crenças atuais possuem justificação prima facie) e torna-se incapaz de explicar a racionalidade das revoluções científicas; ou rejeita o conservadorismo epistêmico, e torna-se incapaz de criticar sistemas cognitivos alternativos, por mais absurdos que sejam (desde que coerentes). De um modo ou de outro, o voluntarismo oferece uma epistemologia incompleta para cumprir as finalidades postuladas por van Fraasen.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ALSPECTOR-KELLY, M. "Constructive Empiricism Revisited". Metascience, [s. l.], v. 21, 2012, p. 187–191.

BAUMANN, P. "Empiricism, Stances, and The Problem of Voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, 2011, p. 27–36.

BLACKBURN, S. Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

BOUCHER, S. "Stances and Epistemology". Metaphilosophy, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 4, 2018.

BOZZO, A. P. "On What Empiricism Cannot Be". Metaphilosophy, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 2, 2016.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. "A Puzzle About Voluntarism About Rational Epistemic Stances". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 37, 2011., p. 37–48

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. "Suspension of Belief and Epistemologies of Science". International Journey for the Study of Skepticism, [s. l.], v. 5, 2015, p. 168–192.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

CHRISTENSEN, D. "Conservatism in Epistemology". Noûs, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 1, 1994, p. 69–89.

DICKEN, P. Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

ELDER, J. "Defending stance voluntarism". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 176, n. 11, 2019, p. 3019–3039.

ENGEL, P. "Volitionism and Voluntarism about Belief". In: MEIJERS, A. (Ed.). Belief, Cognition and the Will. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1999, p. 9–25.

FINE, A. "The Natural Ontological Attitude". In: LEPLIN, J. (Ed.). Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984, p. 83–107.

HARMAN, G. Reasoning, Meaning and Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

HO, D. "Farewell to Empiricism". In: MONTON, B. (Ed.). Images of Empiricism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 319–334.

JAMES, W. "The Will to Believe". The New World, [s. l.], v. 5, 1896, p. 327–347.

JAUERNIG, A. "Must Empiricism Be a Stance, and Could It Be One? How to Be an Empiricist and a Philosopher at the Same Time". In: MONTON, B. (Ed.). Images of Empiricism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 272–318.

LADYMAN, J. "Discussion: Empiricism versus Metaphysics". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, 2004, p. 133–145.

LADYMAN, J. "The Epistemology of Constructive Empiricism". In: MONTON, B. (Ed.). Images of Empiricism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 46–61.

LIPTON, P. "Epistemic Options". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, 2004, p. 147–158.

MADDY, P. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

MCCAIN, K. "The virtues of epistemic conservatism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 164, n. 2, 2008, p. 185–200.

O’SHAUGHNESSY, B. The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

OWENS, D. "Epistemic Akrasia". The Monist, [s. l.], v. 85, 2002, p. 381–397.

PSILLOS, S. "Putting a Bridle on Irrationality: An Appraisal of Van Fraassen’s New Epistemology". In: MONTON, B. (Ed.). Images of Empiricism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 134–164.

ROWBOTTOM, D. P. "Stances and paradigms: a reflection". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, 2011, p. 111–119.

ROWBOTTOM, D. P.; BUENO, O. "How to change it: modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 7–17, 2011.

ROWBOTTOM, D. P. "The Empirical Stance vs. The Critical Attitude". South African Journal of Philosophy, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, 2005, p. 200–223.

SCHOENFIELD, M. "Permission to Believe: Why Permissivism is True and What It Tell Us About Irrelevant Influences on Belief". Noûs, [s. l.], v. 48, 2014, p. 193–218.

STEUP, M. "Empiricism, metaphysics, and voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, 2011, p. 19–26.

TELLER, P. "What is a Stance". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, 2004, p. 159–171.

TELLER, P. "Learning to live with voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, 2011, p. 49–66.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science". In: CHURCHLAND, P.; HOOKER, C. (Eds.). Images of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1985.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "The False Hopes of Traditional Epistemology". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, [s. l.], v. 60, 2000, p. 253–80.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Constructive Empiricism Now". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 106, 2001, p. 151–170.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. The Empirical Stance. New Have & London: Yale University Press, 2002.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Précis of The Empirical Stance". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, 2004a, p. 127–132.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Replis to Discussion of The Empirical Stance". Philosophical Issues, [s. l.], v. 121, 2004b, p. 171–192.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "From a View of Science to a New Empiricism". In: MONTON, B. (Ed.). Images of Empiricism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 337–384.

WILLIAMS, B. "Deciding to Believe". In: Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973, p. 136–151.

WYLIE, A. "Arguments for Scientific Realism: the Ascending Spiral". American Philosophical Quarterly, [s. l.], v. 23, 1986, p. 287–297.

Publicado

20-11-2023

Cómo citar

MALAVOLTA E SILVA, B. O Voluntarismo de Van Fraassen: Anarquia Epistêmica ou Irracionalismo Científico. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), [S. l.], v. 30, n. 63, 2023. DOI: 10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n63ID29583. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29583. Acesso em: 22 dic. 2024.