Logical disputes and the a priori

Autores

  • Graham Priest Professor at CUNY (City University of New York); Visitor Professor at University of Melbourne.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40ID7482

Palavras-chave:

Logic, Theory choice, Rationality, A priori, Multiple criteria

Resumo

In this paper, I propose a general model for the rational resolution of disputes about logic, and discuss a number of its features. These include its dispensing with a traditional notion of the a priori in logic, and some objections to which this might give rise.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BEALER, G. A priori knowledge and the scope of philosophy. Philosophical Studies, v. 81, p. 121–142, 1996.

BEALER, G. A priori knowledge: Replies to William Lycan and Ernest Sosa. Philosophical Studies, v. 81, p. 163–174, 1996.

BOGHOSSIAN, P. Knowledge of logic. In: BOGHOSSIAN, P.; PEACOCKE, C. (Ed.). New Essays on the a Priori. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. p. 229–254.

BONJOUR, L. In Defence of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

CARROLL, L. What the tortoise said to achilles. Mind, v. 4, p. 278–280, 1895.

COOK, R. Intuitionism reconsidered. In: SHAPIRO, S. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 387–411.

HARMAN, G. Change of View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1986.

MARES, E. A Priori. Kingston-ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011.

MARES, E. Belief revision, probabilism, and choice of logic. Review of Symbolic Logic, v. 7, p. 647–670, 2014.

PRIEST, G. Two dogmas of quineanism. Philosophical Quarterly, v. 29, p. 289–301, 1979.

PRIEST, G. Classical logic aufgehoben. In: PRIEST, G.; ROUTLEY, R.; NORMAN, J. (Ed.). Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1989. cap. 4.

PRIEST, G. Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

PRIEST, G. Revising logic. In: RUSH, P. (Ed.). The Metaphysics of Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. cap. 12.

QUINE, W. V. O. Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, v. 60, p. 20–43, 1951.

QUINE, W. V. O. Philosophy of Logic. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1970.

QUINE, W. V. O.; ULLIAN, J. S. The Web of Belief. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1978.

ROUTLEY, R. The choice of logical foundations: non-classical choices and the ultralogical choice. Studia Logica, v. 39, p. 79–98, 1980.

RUSSELL, G. Metaphysical analyticity and the epistemology of logic. Philosophical Studies, v. 171, p. 161–175, 2014.

WASON, P. C.; JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. Psychology of Reasoning: structure and content. Cambridge-MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.

WRIGHT, C. Inventing logical necessity. In: BUTTERFIELD, J. (Ed.). Language, Mind and Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. p. 187–209.

WRIGHT, C. Intuition, entitlement, and the epistemology of logical laws. Dialectica, v. 58, p. 155–175, 2004.

WRIGHT, C. Basic (propositional) knowledge of (truths of) logic. Arché Seminar Paper, University of St. Andrews, 2007.

Downloads

Publicado

24-06-2016

Como Citar

PRIEST, G. Logical disputes and the a priori. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), [S. l.], v. 23, n. 40, p. 29–57, 2016. DOI: 10.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40ID7482. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7482. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2024.

Edição

v. 23 n. 40 (2016): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Termos da licença:

Atribuição Atribuição (BY) Os licenciados têm o direito de copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, conquanto que deem créditos devidos ao autor ou licenciador, na maneira especificada por estes.

 

NãoComercial Não Comercial (NC) Os licenciados podem copiar, distribuir, exibir e executar a obra e fazer trabalhos derivados dela, desde que sejam para fins não comerciais.

 

CompartilhaIgual (SA) Compartilha Igual (SA) Os licenciados devem distribuir obras derivadas somente sob uma licença idêntica à que governa a obra original ou menos restritiva.