An analysis of the adherence of Brazilian organizations to GRI as a method of disclosure of corporate social responsibility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2020v12n2ID21526Keywords:
Social Corporate Responsibility. Disclosure. Global Reporting Initiative. Adhesion. Brazil.Abstract
Purpose: Organizations have published corporate social responsibility reports aimed at spreading their social responsibility. In this sense, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) develops structured models of sustainability reports that help organizations design and disseminate them. The objective of this paper is to analyze the evolution of GRI adherence and the quality of CSR reports provided by Brazilian organizations.
Methodology: Data for all Brazilian organizations that adhered to GRI, in the period 2000-2017, were collected for a total of 461 organizations and 2,142 observations. Descriptive analyses and tests for the difference in proportions have been processed.
Results: The results show that there was a significant increase in the number of Brazilian organizations that joined GRI, with an average annual growth of around 48%. Business organizations are the ones that most disclose social action through GRI, although there are also organizations of other nature. There is a strong predominance of large companies. About the quality of information, it is perceived that about 90% of the statements already follow GRI guidelines, and more than half are not yet subject to an external audit. Although slight, there has been observed a breakthrough in the disclosure of reports that integrate financial and social information.
Contributions of the Study: The study about CSR report disclosure in GRI format provides to academic community information on how this disclosure tool has been deemed relevant by business organizations or not in Brazil. The work provides additional contribution by presenting a detailed analysis of GRI reporting disclosure evolution by Brazilian organizations. In addition, the study contributes by pointing out that GRI has been established as an important channel for the dissemination of information on social actions and sustainability for Brazilian organizations. Regarding the academic point of view, the research collaborates in advancing the studies related to voluntary disclosure and in deepening the analysis of the quality of GRI reports drafted by organizations.
Downloads
References
Adams, C. A. (2015). The International Integrated Reporting Council: A call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 23–28.
Ahmed, K., & Courtis, J. K. (1999). Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: a meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review, 31(1), 35-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1998.0082
Ambrozini, L. S. (2017). Pressões internas e externas na utilização de padrões de divulgação de informações socioambientais amplamente aceitos: uma análise sobre estrutura de governança corporativa, ambiente institucional e a perspectiva de legitimação. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 14(31), 03-25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2017v14n31p3
Archel, P., Husillos, J., Larrinaga, C., & Spence, C. (2009). Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(8), 1284-1307.
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-González, C., & Moneva-Abadía, J. M. (2008). Legitimating reputation/the reputation of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 371-374. doi: 10.1108/09513570810863969
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 337-361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570810863932
Bertoncello, S. L. T., & Júnior, J. C. (2007). A importância da Responsabilidade Social Corporativa como fator de diferenciação. FACOM(17), 70-76.
Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Van Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., & Christiaens, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture? Accounting Forum, 35(3), 187-204. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2011.06.007
Braga, C., Silva, P. P., & Santos, A. (2014). Environmental disclosure in the Brazilian electricity sector. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 37-52.
Brown, J. A., & Forster, W. R. (2013). CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 301-312. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1251-4
Buzby, S. L. (1975). Company Size, Listed Versus Unlisted Stocks, and the Extent of Financial Disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 16-37.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50(6), 449-454.
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2004). Pesquisa em administração: um guia prático para alunos de graduação e pós-graduação (2 ed. Vol. 1). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Conceição, S. H., Dourado, G. B., & Silva, S. F. (2012). Global reporting initiative (gri) - um estudo exploratório da prática de evidenciação em sustentabilidade empresarial na américa latina. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 2(3), 17-38.
Crisóstomo, V. L., Prudêncio, P. A., & Forte, H. C. (2017). An Analysis of the Adherence to GRI for Disclosing Information on Social Action and Sustainability Concerns. In A. Belal & S. Cooper (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management: Social and Environmental Accounting in Brazil (Vol. 6, pp. 69-103): Emerald Publishing Limited.
De los Ríos Berjillos, A., Ruiz Lozano, M., Tirado Valencia, P., & Carbonero Ruz, M. (2012). Una aproximación a la relación entre información sobre la responsabilidad social orientada al cliente y la reputación corporativa de las entidades financieras españolas. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 15(3), 130-140.
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Tobin, J. (2002). An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983-1997: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (3), 312-343.
Deegan, C., Rankin, M., & Voght, P. (2000). Firms’ disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence. Accounting Forum, 24, 101-130.
Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An Examination of Differences Between Organizational Legitimacy and Organizational Reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
Dowling, J. B., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
Firth, M. (1979). The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing, and Auditors on Voluntary Disclosure in Corporate Annual Reports. Accounting and Business Research, 9(36), 273-280. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1979.9729168
Flower, J. (2015). The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1-17.
Freeman, R. E., Rusconi, G., Signori, S., & Strudler, A. (2012). Stakeholder Theory(ies): Ethical Ideas and Managerial Action. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 1-2. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1374-7
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
Gallego-Álvarez, I., & Quina-Custodio, I. A. (2016). Disclosure of corporate social responsibility information and explanatory factors. Online Information Review, 40(2), 218-238. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0116
García-Sánchez, I.-M., & Noguera-Gámez, L. (2018). Institutional Investor Protection Pressures versus Firm Incentives in the Disclosure of Integrated Reporting. Australian Accounting Review, 28(2), 199-219. doi: 10.1111/auar.12172
Garcia, S., Cintra, Y. C., Ribeiro, M. S., & Dibbern, B. R. S. (2015). Qualidade da divulgação socioambiental: um estudo sobre a acurácia das informações contábeis nos relatórios de sustentabilidade. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 12(25), 67-94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2015v12n25p95
Gisbert, A., & Lunardi, V. (2012). A evolução da RSC no Brasil entre as empresas listadas na Bovespa. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 6(1), 90-111.
Gray, D. E. (2011). Pesquisa no mundo real (2 ed.). Porto Alegre: Penso.
GRI. (2015). Sustainability Disclosure Database. Retrieved 24 fev. 2016, from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Data-Legend-Sustainability-Disclosure-Database-Profiling.pdf
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58-74. doi: 10.1002/smj.801
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2007). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Value Creation among Large Firms: Lessons from the Spanish Experience. Long Range Planning, 40(6), 594-610.
Jamali, D. (2008). A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective into Theory and Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 213–231.
Kiliç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(1), 115-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2016-1498
Loderer, C., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Protecting Minority Shareholders: Listed versus Unlisted Firms. Financial Management, 39(1), 33-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01065.x
Lopes, A. C., De Luca, M. M. M., Góis, A. D., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2017). Disclosure socioambiental, reputação corporativa e criação de valor nas empresas listadas na BM&FBOVESPA. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 9(1), 364–382.
Madalena, J. D., Rover, S., Ferreira, D. M., & Ferreira, L. F. (2016). Estudo dos Relatórios de Sustentabilidade GRI de Empresas Brasileiras. Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental, 20(1), 566-579.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., & Gray, S. J. (1995). Factors Influencing Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures By U.S., U.K. and Continental European Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 555-572. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490186
Michelon, G. (2011). Sustainability Disclosure and Reputation: A Comparative Study. Corporate Reputation Review, 14(2), 79-96. doi: 10.1057/crr.2011.10
Murcia, F. D.-R., & Santos, A. (2009). Fatores determinantes do nível de disclosure voluntário das companhias abertas no Brasil. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPEC), 3(2), 72-95.
Nikolaeva, R. N., & Bicho, M. L. N. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. . Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 136-157.
Reis, S. G., Cintra, Y. C., Ribeiro, M. d. S., & Dibbern, B. R. S. (2015). Qualidade da divulgação socioambiental: um estudo sobre a acurácia das informações contábeis nos relatórios de sustentabilidade. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 12(25), 67-94. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2015v12n25p67
Ricardo, V. S., Barcellos, S. S., & Bortolon, P. M. (2017). Relatório de sustentabilidade ou relato integrado das empresas listadas na BM&FBOVESPA: fatores determinantes de divulgação. RGSA - Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 11(1), 90-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v11i1.1233
Robertson, D. C., & Nicholson, N. (1996). Expressions of corporate social responsibility in U.K. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(10), 1095-1106.
Roesch, S. M. A. (2005). Projetos de Estágio e de Pesquisa em Administração: Guia Para Estágios, Trabalhos de Conclusão, Dissertações e Estudos de Caso (3 ed.): Editora Atlas.
Seramim, R. J., Zanella, T. P., & Rojo, C. A. (2017). A sustentabilidade e gestão da imagem: um estudo de caso em cooperativa agroindustrial do oeste do Paraná. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 6(3), 15-33. doi: 10.5585/geas.v6i3.469
Silva, E. A., Freire, O. B. D. L., & Silva, F. Q. P. O. (2014). Indicadores de Sustentabilidade como Instrumentos de Gestão: Uma Análise da GRI, Ethos E ISE. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 3(1), 130-148. doi: 10.5585/geas.v3i2.130
Silva, T. L. G. B., Maia, L. C. C., & Leal, E. A. (2017). Grau de aderência aos indicadores de desempenho ambiental do gri em um mercado emergente: uma análise em empresas com potencial poluidor em dois segmentos. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 9(1), 21-36.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Sutantoputra, A. W. (2009). Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(1), 34-48. doi: 10.1108/13563280910931063
Thomson, I. (2015). ‘But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report’ a commentary on ‘The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure’ by Flower, J. Critical perspectives on accounting, 27, 18-22.
Tilling, M. V., & Tilt, C. A. (2010). The edge of legitimacy: voluntary social and environmental reporting in Rothmans’ 1956-1999 annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 55-81.
Tullberg, J. (2013). Stakeholder theory: Some revisionist suggestions. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42, 127-135. doi: doi:10.1016/j.socec.2012.11.014
Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 167-175.
Van Staden, C. J., & Hooks, J. (2007). A comprehensive comparison of corporate environmental reporting and responsiveness. The British Accounting Review, 39(3), 197-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2007.05.004
Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
