The principles underlying the IFRS and the measurement bases of the elements comprising the financial statements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n1ID23625Keywords:
IFRS standards, principles, measurement, fair value.Abstract
Purpose: This theoretical essay seeks to present concepts, arguments and discussions about the adoption and use of IFRS, focusing on their underlying principles and measurement bases.
Methodology: Literature review with presentation and discussion of arguments from authors who have researched the use of IFRS and its underlying principles and measurement bases.
Results: Principle-based accounting standards are seen by a number of authors as a possible solution to the problem of accounting harmonization. However, another stream of authors states that principle-based accounting standardization, although it may result in higher quality it is less assertive financial reporting, given the existence of subjectivity in the content of financial statements. This fact leads to the conclusion that absolute harmonization of accounting standards would be impossible.
Contributions of the Study: The study proposes notes regarding the discussion on IFRS, which are responsible for increasing the quality of financial statements, while at the same time reducing the reliability of the information produced, in view of the difficulties inherent to the application of the concept of fair value.
Downloads
References
Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik, T. S., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2011). Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The accounting review, 86(3), 747-767.
Aldredge, M., Cooley, G., & DuBois, S. (2018). The impact of International Financial Reporting Standards on course coverage in the US Accounting Curricula: empirical study. International Journal of Education Research, 13(1).
Alexander, D., & Jermakowicz, E. (2006). A true and fair view of the principles/rules debate. Abacus, 42(2), 132-164.
Antunes, M. T. P., Grecco, M. C. P., Formigoni, H., & Neto, O. D. M. (2012). A adoção no Brasil das normas internacionais de contabilidade IFRS: o processo e seus impactos na qualidade da informação contábil. Revista de Economia e Relações Internacionais, 10(20), 5-19.
Aquino, W., & Peterson, M. (2008). Valor justo. In Congresso Brasileiro de Contabilidade. Vol. 18.
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of accounting research, 46(3), 467-498.
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M., & Williams, C. (2012). Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54(1), 68-93.
Barth, M. E., & Israeli, D. (2013). Disentangling mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 178-188.
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Young, D., & Zhuang, Z. (2014). Relevance of differences between net income based on IFRS and domestic standards for European firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(3-4), 297-327.
Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M. H., & Williams, C. D. (2018). Effects on comparability and capital market benefits of voluntary IFRS adoption. Journal of Financial Reporting, 3(1), 1-22.
Beckman, J., Brandes, C., & Eierle, B. (2007). German reporting practices: an analysis of reconciliations from German commercial code to IFRS or US GAAP. Advances in International Accounting, 20, 253-294.
Benston, G. J., Bromwich, M., & Wagenhofer, A. (2006). Principles?versus rules?based accounting standards: the FASB's standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42(2), 165-188.
Bernheim, Y., & Escaffre, L. (1999). Evaluation à la juste valeur: un nouveau modèle comptable. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association Francophone de Comptabilité, Vuibert, 25-45.
Braga, R. N. (2017). Efeitos da adoção das IFRS sobre o tax avoidance. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28(75), 407-424.
Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1373-1400.
Burgemeestre, B., Hulstijn, J., & Tan, Y. H. (2009, July). Rule-based versus Principle-based Regulatory Compliance. In JURIX (pp. 37-46).
Camfferman, K., & Zeff, S. A. (2018). The challenge of setting standards for a worldwide constituency: Research implications from the IASB’s early history. European Accounting Review, 27(2), 289-312.
Cairns, D., Massoudi, D., Taplin, R., & Tarca, A. (2011). IFRS fair value measurement and accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia. The British Accounting Review, 43(1), 1-21.
Carmona, S., & Trombetta, M. (2008). On the global acceptance of IAS/IFRS accounting standards: The logic and implications of the principles-based system. Journal of accounting and public policy, 27(6), 455-461.
Casta, J. F. (2003). La comptabilité en “juste valeur” permet-elle une meilleure représentation de l'entreprise?. Revue d'économie financière, 17-31.
Castro, F. H., & Santana, V. (2018). Informativeness of stock prices after IFRS adoption in Brazil. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 47, 46-59.
Cordazzo, M. (2008). The impact of IAS/IFRS on accounting practices: evidence from Italian listed companies. Séminaire DEMA/ERM.
Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. (2013). Adopting a label: Heterogeneity in the economic consequences around IAS/IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 495-547.
Ding, Y., Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2005). Why do national GAAP differ from IAS? The role of culture. The international journal of accounting, 40(4), 325-350.
Felski, E. (2017). How does local adoption of IFRS for those countries that modified IFRS by design, impair comparability with countries that have not adapted IFRS?. Journal of International Accounting Research, 16(3), 59-90.
Gatsios, R. C., da Silva, J. M., Ambrozini, M. A., Neto, A. A., & Lima, F. G. (2016). Impacto da adoção do padrão IFRS no custo de capital próprio das empresas de capital aberto no Brasil. Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Mackenzie Management Review), 17(4).
Gray, S. J. (1983). The impact of international accounting differences from a security-analysis perspective: some European evidence. In International Accounting and Transnational Decisions (pp. 95-107). Butterworth-Heinemann.
Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1), 1-15.
Grillo, F. F., Lachini, T. C., Baioco, V. G., Reina, D., & Sarlo Neto, A. (2016). Value Relevance: análise dos efeitos da avaliação a valor justo. ConTexto. Porto Alegre, 16(32), 94-109.
Ho, H. (2016), A case study of true and fair view override in financial reporting. Nang Yan Business Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 13-19.
Jerman, L. (2013). La juste valeur: une comptabilité actuarielle pour les marchés... ou les comptables?. Comptabilité sans Frontières. The French Connection, Canada. pp.cd-rom. Hal-00991877.
Joshi, M., Yapa, P. W. S., & Kraal, D. (2016). IFRS adoption in ASEAN countries: Perceptions of professional accountants from Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(2), 211-240.
Iudicibus, S., Kanitz, S. C., Martins, E., Ramos, A.T., Castilho, E., Benatti, L., Weber Filho, E., & Domingues Junior, R. (1992). Contabilidade Introdutória. Editora: Atlas, 7ª ed.
Lin, S., Riccardi, W. N., Wang, C., Hopkins, P. E., & Kabureck, G. (2019). Relative effects of IFRS adoption and IFRS convergence on financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2), 588-628.
Lourenço, I. M. E. C., de Almeida Delgado, M. E. M., & Branco, C. (2015). Principais consequências da adoção das IFRS: análise da literatura existente e sugestões para investigação futura. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças-USP, 26(68), 126-139.
Kumar, K. A. (2015). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption on financial decisions. Journal of Accounting & Marketing, 4, 2-6.
Kvaal, E., & Nobes, C. (2010). International differences in IFRS policy choice: a research note. Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 40. No. 2, pp. 173–187, 2010.
Kothari, J., & Barone, E. (2011). Advanced financial accounting: an international approach. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Mauss, V., Bleil, V., Bonatto, A., Oliveira, C., & Santos, G. (2007). A Evolução da Contabilidade e seus objetivos. Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão, 4.
Mota, R. H. G., Oliveira, A. F. D., Niyama, J. K., & Paulo, E. (2016). Normas baseadas em princípios e regras: uma análise comparativa das normas do IASB e FASB. Revista Ambiente Contábil-Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 8(2), 19-39.
Palea, V., & Maino, R. (2013). Private equity fair value measurement: a critical perspective on IFRS 13. Australian Accounting Review, 23(3), 264-278.
Palea, V. (2018). Financial reporting for sustainable development: Critical insights into IFRS implementation in the European Union. In Accounting forum (Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 248-260). Taylor & Francis.
Nobes, C. W. (1983) A judgemental international classification of financial reporting practices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 10(1) : 1–19.
O'Connell, V., & Sullivan, K. (2008). The impact of mandatory conversion to IFRS on the net income of FTSEurofirst 80 firms. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance (JARAF), 3(2), 17.
Petaibanlue, J., Walker, M., & Lee, E. (2015). When did analyst forecast accuracy benefit from increased cross-border comparability following IFRS adoption in the EU?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 42, 278-291.
Radebaugh, L. H., Gray, S. J., & Black, E. L. (2006). International accounting and multinational enterprises. John Wiley & Sons.
Santos, E. S. (2012). Análise dos impactos dos CPCs da primeira fase de transição para o IFRS no Brasil: um exame dos ajustes aos resultados nas DFPs de 2008. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 6(15), 23-43.
Santos, E. S. (2015). Impacto Total da Implementação do IFRS no Lucro e Patrimônio Líquido das Empresas Brasileiras. Revista Base (Administração e Contabilidade) da UNISINOS, 12(3), 225-241.
Santos, E. S., & Calixto, L. (2010). Impacts of the initial international accounting harmonization (law 11.638/07) on public firms results. RAE eletrônica, 9(1), 0-0.
Saudagaran, S. M. (2009). International accounting: A user perspective. CCH.
Sayed, S., & Salotti, B. M. (2014). O uso do valor justo e suas relações com os valores de Mercado das instituições financeiras. Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 25(3), 15-37.
Schipper, K. (2003). Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting horizons, 17(1), 61-72.
Tsunogaya, N. (2016). Issues affecting decisions on mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Japan. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(5), 828-860.
Toluwa, O., & Power, O. J. (2019). Fair Value Accounting: A Conceptual Approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(6), 683-696.
Véron, N. (2007). Histoire et déboires possibles des normes comptables internationales. L'Économie politique, (4), 92-112.
Wang, C. (2014). Accounting Standards Harmonization and Financial Statement Comparability: Evidence From Transnational Information Transfer. Journal of Accounting Research, 52 (4), 955-992.
Zeff, S. A. (2014). A Evolução do IASC para o IASB e os Desafios Enfrentados. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 25(SPE), 300-320.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.