Methodological analysis of incompatible EBITDA disclosed by the companies listed in B3: identification of divergent variables in reconciliations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2023v15n2ID30732Keywords:
EBITDA, Methodological errors, Non-GAAP measuresAbstract
Purpose: To identify the variables responsible the methodological differences that cause incompatibilities in the EBITDA disclosed by the companies listed on B3, related to errors in data collection and undue changes in the formula by the reconciliation issuers.
Methodology: Application of descriptive statistics on a sample of 35 entities that disclosed the incompatible EBITDA for 2018, observing the behavior of the indicator's variables in the years 2018, 2019 and 2020.
Results: The most common calculation errors occurred when collecting data from the financial statements. The variable that most impacted erroneously calculated values was related to depreciation, amortization and depletion. It is concluded that, even with the standardization of the disclosure of EBITDA by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil as of 2012, errors in the calculation of this indicator are still common, which reinforces the need for practical studies that verify the conformity of these companies' non-GAAP disclosures.
Contributions of the Study: Considering that non-GAAP performance measures, such as EBITDA, are disseminated worldwide among investors and analysts to analyze corporate results, such measures are at risk of error and manipulation by the issuers' managers. In this sense, the study contributed in the practical sphere because it demonstrated which errors companies effectively made when calculating and demonstrating their EBITDA reconciliations. In addition, it bridges an academic gap concerning the methodology for calculating EBITDA, since even with the growing literature related to non-GAAP disclosures, the method of calculating the indicator has received low attention.
Downloads
References
Altman, E. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609. doi: 10.2307/2978933
Andrade, G. V., & Murcia, F. D. (2019). Uma análise crítica sobre os ajustes adicionais considerados nas divulgações da medida não GAAP “EBITDA ajustado” em relatórios de companhias listadas brasileiras. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 13(4), 469-486. doi: 10.17524/repec.v13i4.2412
Bartov, E., Givoly, D., & Hayn. C. (2002). The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 173-204. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00045-9
Berger, P. (2005). Discussion of “are investors misled by ‘pro forma’ earnings?”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 965-976. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2005.tb00308.x
Beyer, A., Cohen, D., Lys, T., & Walther, B. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 296-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003
Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., & Larson, C. R. (2003). Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 36(1-3), 285 319. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc eco.2003.06.001
Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2007). Who trades on pro forma earnings information? The Accounting Review, 82(3), 581-619. doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.3.581
Black, E. L. (2016). The ethical reporting of non-GAAP performance measures. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 27(70), 7-11. doi: 10.1590/1808-057x201690090
Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., Joo, T. T, & Schmardebeck, R. (2017). The relation between earnings management and non-GAAP reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 750-782. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12284
Black, D. E., Christensen, T. E., Ciesielski, J. T., & Whipple, B. C. (2018). Non-GAAP reporting: Evidence from academia and current practice. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 45(3-4), 259-294. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12298
Black, D. E., & Christensen, T. E. (2009). US managers’ use of ‘pro forma’ adjustments to meet strategic earnings targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3-4), 297-326. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02128.x
Bradshaw, M. (2003). A discussion of “assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 321-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.09.002
Bradshaw, M. T.; Christensen, T. E.; Gee, K. H., & Whipple, B. C. (2018). Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and their implications for accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 66(1), 46-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.01.003
Carvalho, V. J. R. (2014). Das razões da utilização do EBITDA por profissionais de mercado: Uma contribuição prática. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo. Recuperado de https://dspace.mackenzie.br/handle/10899/26303
Christensen, T. (2007). Discussion of “letting the ‘tail wag the dog’: The debate over GAAP versus street earnings revisited”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 741-762. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2007.tb00122.x
Cornejo-Saavedra, E., & Diaz, D. (2006). Medidas de Ganancia: EBITDA, EBIT, Utilidad Neta y Flujo de Efectivo. Revista Economía y Administración, 1(1) 36-40. Recuperado em 12 junho, 2022, de http://repositorio.uchile.cl/bitstream/handle/2250/127394/153%20Cornejo-Diaz.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Deephouse, D., & Carter, S. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
Diniz, N. (2015). Análise das demonstrações financeiras (1a ed.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ: SESES.
Doyle, J. T., Jennings, J. N., & Soliman, M. T. (2013). Do managers define non-GAAP earnings to meet or beat analyst forecasts? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(1), 40 56. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.03.002
Dye, R. A. (2001). An evaluation of ‘essays on disclosure’ and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 181-235. Recuperado em 01 fevereiro, 2022, de https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejaecon/v_3a32_3ay_3a2001_3ai_3a 1-3_3ap_3a181-235.htm
Entwistle, G., Feltham, G., & Mbagwu, C. (2006). Misleading disclosure of pro forma earnings: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 355-372. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9095-4
European Securities and Market Authority. (2015). ESMA guidelines on alternative performance measures. Recuperado em 14 maio, 2022, de https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/ default/files/library/2015/10/2015-esma-1415en.pdf
Financial Reporting Council. (2013). Feedback statement thinking about disclosures in a broader context. Recuperado em 14 maio, 2022, de https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/332a 8350-c717-45c5-8549-e39e5db05c78/Disclosure-framework-Feedback-statement-Draft-FINAL-25-June-2013.pdf
Guillamon-Saorin, E., Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2017). Impression management and non-GAAP disclosure in earnings announcements. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 44(3-4), 448-479. doi: 10.1111/jbfa.12238
Heflin, F., & Hsu, C. (2008). The impact of the SEC’s regulation of non-GAAP disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2-3), 349 365. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.494882
Instrução CVM n. 527, de 4 de outubro de 2012. (2012). Dispõe sobre a divulgação voluntária de informações de natureza não contábil denominadas LAJIDA e LAJIR. Comissão de Valores Mobiliários. Recuperado em 12 janeiro, 2022, de https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/export/sites/c vm/legislacao/instrucoes/anexos/500/inst527.pdf
International Accounting Standards Board. (2022). Primary Financial Statements. Recuperado em 21 maio, 2022, de https://www.ifrs.org/projects/work-plan/primary-financial-statements/
International Organization of Securities Commissions. (2016). Statement on non-GAAP financial measures. Recuperado em 19 maio, 2022, de https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdo cs/pdf/IOSCOPD532.pdf
Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2015). The role of institutional and economic factors in the strategic use of non- GAAP disclosures to beat earnings benchmarks. European Accounting Review, 24(1), 95-128. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.894928
Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2020). Industry competition and non-GAAP disclosures. Accounting and Business Research, 51(2), 156-184. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2020.1798209
Johnson, A., Percy, M., Clarke, P. S., & Cameron, P. (2014). The impact of the disclosure of non-GAAP earnings in Australian annual reports on non sophisticated users. Australian Accounting Review, 24(3), 207-217. doi: 10.1111/auar.12034
Kistner, S. P., & Platt Neto, O. A. (2020). Características corporativas sobre a divulgação voluntária do EBITDA pelas companhias listadas na B3 em 2018. Revista Conhecimento Contábil, 10(2), 89-110. doi: 10.31864/rcc.v10i2.2686
Lougee, B. A., & Marquardt, C. A. (2004). Earnings informativeness and strategic disclosure: An empirical examination of ‘pro forma’ earnings. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 769-795. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.3.769
Malone, L., Tarca, A., & Wee, M. (2016). IFRS non-GAAP earnings disclosures and fair value measurement. Accounting & Finance, 56(1), 59-97. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12204
Maragno, L. M. D., Borba, J. A., & Fey, V. A. (2014). Como as empresas mais negociadas no BM&FBOVESPA divulgam o EBITDA? Revista de Contabilidade do Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis da UERJ, 19(1), 58-79. doi: 10.12979/8194
Marques, A. (2010). Disclosure strategies among S&P 500 firms: Evidence on the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures and financial statements in earnings press releases. The British Accounting Review, 42(2), 119-131. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.02.004
Marques, A. (2017). Non-GAAP earnings: International overview and suggestions for research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(3), 318-335. doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-04-2017-0140
Matarazzo, D. C. (2010). Análise financeira de balanços: Abordagem gerencial (7a ed.). São Paulo, SP: Editora Atlas.
Matsumoto, D. (2002). Management’s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 483-514. Recuperado em 12 junho, 2022, de https://www.jstor.org/ stable/3068885
Mey, M. T. (2019). Investigating the association between the reconciliation quality of EBITDA disclosure by JSE-listed companies and factors associated with opportunistic disclosure. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de Stellenbosch, África do Sul. Recuperado de https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10291954.2020.1817268
Mey, M. T., & Lamprecht, C. (2020). The many faces of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA): Assessing the decision usefulness of EBITDA disclosure by Johannesburg Stock Exchange-listed companies. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 13(1), 1-13. doi: 10.4102/jef.v13i1.488
Miller, J. S. (2009). Opportunistic Disclosures of Earnings Forecasts and Non-GAAP Earnings Measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 03-10. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9903-0
Nichols, N., Gray, S., & Street, D. (2005). Pro forma adjustments to GAAP earnings: Bias, materiality, and SEC action. Research in Accounting Regulation, 18, 29-52. doi: 10.1016/S1052-0457(05)18002-3
Nota Explicativa à Instrução CVM n. 527, de 4 de outubro de 2012. (2012). Ref: Instrução CVM nº 527, de 04 de outubro de 2012, que dispõe sobre a divulgação voluntária de informações de natureza não contábil denominadas LAJIDA e LAJIR. Comissão de Valores Mobiliários. Recuperado em 12 janeiro, 2022, de https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/export /sites/cvm/legislacao/notas-explicativas/anexos/nota527.pdf
Oliveira, N. L. (2018). Efeito da divulgação de relatórios GAAP e não GAAP sobre o valor das ações no mercado brasileiro de capitais. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Brasília, Brasília. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/33260?locale=fr
Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 26 (R1), de 2 de dezembro de 2011. (2011). Apresentação das Demonstrações Contábeis. Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. Recuperado em 12 janeiro, 2022, de http://static.cpc.aatb.com.br/Documentos/312_CPC_26_R1_rev%2014.pdf
Richardson, S., Teoh, S. H., & Wysocki, P. D. (2004). The walk‐down to beatable analyst forecasts: The role of equity issuance and insider trading incentives. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(4), 885-924. doi: 10.1506/KHNW-PJYL-ADUB-0RP6
Rozenbaum, O. (2017). EBITDA and managers’ investment and leverage choices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36 (1), 513–546. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12387
Sousa, A. M., Feltes, T., Meurer, R. M., & Ribeiro, A. M. (2022). Efeito da suavização intencional de resultados na persistência dos lucros das empresas brasileiras de capital aberto. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, (41)2, 87-106. doi: 10.4025/enfoque.v41i2.53295
Verriest, A., Bouwens, J., & Kok, T. de. (2018). The prevalence and validity of EBITDA as a performance measure. SSRN Electronic Journal, 4, 1-23. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 3171131
Verrecchia, R. (1983). Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5, 179–194. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3
Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 97-180. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8
Walker, M., & Louvari, V. (2003). The determinants of voluntary disclosure of adjusted earnings per share measures by UK quoted companies. Accounting and Business Research, 33(4), 295-309. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729655
Webber, N. S., Nichols, D. N., & Street, D. (2013). Non-GAAP adjustments to net income appearing in the earnings releases of the S&P 100: An analysis of frequency of occurrence, materiality and rationale. Research in Accounting Regulation, 25(2), 236-251. doi: 10.1016/j.racreg.2013.08.011
Wiggins, R., & Ruefli, T. (2002). Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organization Science, 13(1), 81-105. Recuperado em 14 março, 2022, de https://www.jstor.org/stable/3086069
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.
Português (Brasil)
English
Español (España)
