Writting against culture

Authors

  • Lila Abu-Lughod Universidade de Columbia na Cidade de Nova York/NY
  • Francisco Cleiton Vieira Silva do Rego Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8852-6212
  • Leandro Durazzo Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-5674.2018v5n8ID15615

Keywords:

Writting, Culture, Ethnography

Abstract

In this paper, the anthropologist Lila Abu-Lughod discusses and criticizes the propositions announced by the book Writing Culture, edited by James Clifford and Marcus Fisher. The author proposes that anthropologists begin to write against the concept of culture, emphasizing a type of ethnography of the particular that is able to escape the crystallization of differences and generalizations. The article is also a reaction to the absence of feminists and researchers of multiple ethnic and regional origin in the set of chapters published by Clifford and Fisher that in turn inaugurated a whole theoretical movement in anthropology commonly known as postmodern anthropology. Abu-Lughod's text, as influential as the book by Clifford and Fisher, marks an important theoretical and ethnographic moment for the discipline, by emphasizing and showing the positionality of knowledge beyond the partiality enunciated by postmodern authors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Lila Abu-Lughod, Universidade de Columbia na Cidade de Nova York/NY

My work, strongly ethnographic and mostly based in Egypt, has focused on three broad issues: the relationship between cultural forms and power; the politics of knowledge and representation; and the dynamics of gender and the question of women’s rights in the Middle East. My first book, Veiled Sentiments, was about the politics of sentiment and cultural expression in a Bedouin community in Egypt that made an argument about the complexity of culture. My second book, Writing Women’s Worlds, framed as a feminist ethnography, used individual stories to make a larger argument about “writing against culture” (writing against typifications of social structure and cultural form by attending to internal argument, individual lives, and complex social dynamics) as a means of intervening in vexed discourses about a maligned region as well as challenging transnational feminist representations of women in Arab societies. My third ethnography, Dramas of Nationhood: The Politics of Television in Egypt, a contribution to the anthropology of nations and to media ethnography, explored the tensions between the social inequalities that bedevil nations and the cultural forms that aspire to address them. In a number of edited books, as well as my teaching, I have pursued these themes further to examine questions of gender and modernity in postcolonial theory, of anthropology and global media, and of violence national/cultural memory. Currently, as part of an effort to use anthropology to contribute to larger political debates, I am focusing on critiques of the universalist claims of liberalism and on the ethical and political dilemmas entailed in the international circulation of discourses of human rights in general, and Muslim women’s rights in particular.

Francisco Cleiton Vieira Silva do Rego, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Doutorando em Antropologia Social e Bolsista CAPES

Mestre em Antropologia Social

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Membro do Grupo de Pesquisa "Gênero, Corpo e Sexualidade", GCS/UFRN.

Membro Pós-Graduando da Associação Brasileira de Antropologia - ABA.

References

ABU-LUGHOD, Lila. Veiled Sentiments: Honor and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

_____. Zones of theory in the anthropology of the Arab world. Annual Review of Anthropology 18:276-306, 1989.

_____. Can there be feminist ethnography? Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 5:7-27, 1990a.

_____. Shifting politics in Bedouin love poetry. In: Language and the Politics of Emotion. C. Lutz and L. Abu-Lughod, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990b.

_____. Writing Women's Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press, no prelo.

ABU-LUGHOD, Lila; LUTZ, Catherine. Introduction: discourse, emotion, and the politics of everyday life. In: ____ (Eds.). Language and the politics of emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

ALTORKI, Soraya e EL-SOLH, Camilla. (Eds.). Arab Women in the Field: Studying Your Own Society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1988.

APPADURAI, Arjun. Putting hierarchy in its place. Cultural Anthropology 3: 36-49, 1988.

ARENS, William. The Man-Eating Myth: Anthropology and Anthropology. New York, OUF, 1979.

ASAD, Talal. Anthropologyand the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press, 1973.

_____. Anthropological conceptions of religion: reflections on Geertz. Man 18: 237-59, 1983.

BELENKY, Mary; Clinchy, Blithe; Goldberger, Nancy; Tarule, Jill. Women's Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books, 1986.

BELL, Diane. Daughters of the Dreaming. Melbourne: McPhee Gribble/N. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, 1983.

BOWEN, Elenore S. Return to Laughter. Reprint edition, 1964. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1954.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

BRIGGS, Jean. Never in Anger. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

CESARA, Manda. Reflections of a Woman Anthropologist: No Hiding Place. London and New York: Academic Press, 1982.

CHODOROW, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

CIXOUS, Helene. The laugh of the Medusa. In: ABEL, E.; ABE, E. (Eds.). The Signs Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983. Cohen, K.; Cohen, P. tradução, pp. 279-97.

CLIFFORD, James. Power in dialogue in ethnography. In: STOCKING, Jr., G. W. (Ed.). Observers Observed: Essays on Ethnographic Fieldwork. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983, pp. 121-56.

_____. Introduction: partial truths. In: CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. J. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986a, pp. 1-26.

_____. On ethnographic allegory. In: CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986b, pp. 98-121.

_____. On collecting art and culture. In: CLIFFORD, J. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988a, pp. 215-51.

_____. On ethnographic self fashioning. In: CLIFFORD, J. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988b, pp. 92-113.

CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.

CRAPANZANO, Vincent. On the writing of ethnography. Dialectical Anthropology 2:69-73, 1977.

_____. Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

DUMONT, Jean-Paul. The Headman and I. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1978.

_____. Prologue to ethnography or prolegomena to anthropology. Ethos 14:344-67, 1986.

DWYER, Kevin. Moroccan Dialogues: Anthropology in Question. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.

FABIAN, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

FAHIM, Hussein (Ed.). Indigenous Anthropology in Non- Western Countries. Durham, NC: North Carolina Academic Press, 1982.

FERNEA, Elizabeth W. Guests of the Sheik: An Ethnography of an Iraqi Village. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1965.

FISCHER, Michael M. J. Towards a third world poetics: seeing through short stories and films in the Iranian culture area. Knowledge and Society 5: 171-241, 1984.

_____. Ethnicity and the post-modem arts of memory. In: CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, pp. 194-233.

_____. Aestheticized emotions and critical hermeneutics. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 12:31-42, 1988.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Discipline and Punish. New York: Partheon, 1978.

FRIEDL, Erika. Women of Deh Koh: Lives in an Iranian Village. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1989.

GEERTZ, Clifford. The impact of the concept of culture on the concept of man. In: The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973, pp. 33-54.

_____. Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Hutchinson, 1975, pp. 3-30.

_____. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988.

GILLIGAN, Carol. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

GORDON, Deborah. Writing culture, writing feminism: The poetics and politics of experimental ethnography. Inscriptions 3/4:7-24, 1988.

HARAWAY, Donna. A manifesto for cyborgs: science technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65-107, 1985.

HARDING, Sandra. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.

_____. The method question. Hypatia 2:19-35, 1987.

HARTSOCK, Nancy. Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1985.

HYMES, Dell (Ed.). Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Pantheon, 1969.

IRIGARAY, Luce. Speculum of the Other Woman. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985a. G. C. Gill, trad.

_____. This Sex Which Is Not One. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985b. C. Porter with C. Burks, trad.

JOSEPH, Suad. Feminization, familism, self, and politics: research as a Mughtaribi. In: ALTORKI, S.; C. EL-SOLH, C. (Eds.). Arab Women in the Field: Studying Your Own Society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1988, pp. 25-47.

KONDO, Dorinne. Dissolution and reconstitution of self: implications for anthropological epistemology. Cultural Anthropology 1: 74-88, 1986.

KRISTEVA, Julia. Women's time. Signs 7: 13-35, 1981. A. Jardine e H. Blake, trad.

KUPER, Adam. The Invention of Primitive Society: Transformation of an Illusion. Boston and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1988.

MACKINNON, Catherine. Feminism, Marxism, method, and the state: an agenda for theory. Signs 7: 515-44, 1982.

MARCUS, George E.; Clifford, James. The Making of ethnographic texts: preliminary report. Current Anthropology 26: 267-71, 1985.

MARCUS, George E.; Fischer, Michael. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.

MEIS, Maria. Towards a methodology for feminist research. In: BOWLES, Gloria; DUELLI KLEIN, Renate (Eds). Theories of Women's Studies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983, pp. 117-139.

MINTZ, Sidney. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. New York: Viking, 1985.

MORSY, Soheir. Fieldwork in my Egyptian homeland: toward the demise of anthropology's distinctive other hegemonic tradition. In: AITORKI, S.; EI-SOLH, C. (Eds.). Arab Women in the Field: Studying Your Own Society. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1988, pp. 69-90.

NADER, Laura. "Up the anthropologist" - perspectives gained from studying up. In: HYMES, D. (Ed.). Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Vintage Books, 1969, pp. 284-311.

NARAYAN, Kirin. Saints, Scoundrels, and Storytellers. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989.

ORTNER, Sherry B. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26: 126-66, 1984.

PRATT, Mary Louise. Fieldwork in common places. In: CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.

RABINOW, Paul. Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.

REINHARZ, Shulamit. Experimental analysis: a contribution to feminist research. In: BOWLES, Gloria; DUELLI KLEIN, Renate (Eds). Theories of Women's Studies. London and Boston: Roudedge and Kegan Paul, 1983, pp. 162-91.

RICH, Adrienne. Toward a woman-centered university. In: On Lies, Secrets and Silence, pp. 125-56. New York: W. W. Norton & Co, 1979.

RIESMAN, Paul. Freedom in Fulani Social Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.

RUDDICK, Sara. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6(2): 342-67, 1980.

SACKS, Karen Brodkin. Toward a unified theory of class, race, and gender. American Ethnologist 16(3): 534-50, 1989.

SAID, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon, 1978.

_____. Representing the colonized: anthropology's interlocuters. Critical Inquiry 15:205-25, 1989.

SHOSTAK, Marjorie. Nisa: The Life and Words of a !Kung Woman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.

SMITH, Dorothy. The Everyday World as Problematic. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1987.

STANLEY, Liz; Sue Wise. Breaking out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983.

STRATHERN, Marilyn. Dislodging a worldview: challenge and counter-challenge in the relationship between feminism and anthropology. Australian Feminist Studies I: 1-25, 1985.

_____. An awkward relationship: the case offeminism and anthropology. Signs 12: 276-92, 1987.

TEDIOCK, Dennis. The Spoken Word and the Work of Interpretation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1983.

_____. Questions concerning dialogical anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 43: 325-37, 1987.

TURNER, Edith. The Spirit and the Drum: A Memoir of Africa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1987.

TYLER, Stephen. Post-modern ethnography: from document of the occult to occult document. In: CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, pp. 122-140.

WEINER, Annette. Women of Value, Men of Renown. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.

WOLF, Eric R. Europe and the People without History. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.

WOLF, Margery. The House of Lim. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts, 1968.

Downloads

Published

23-11-2018

How to Cite

ABU-LUGHOD, L.; REGO, F. C. V. S. do; DURAZZO, L. Writting against culture. Equatorial – Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 8, p. 193–226, 2018. DOI: 10.21680/2446-5674.2018v5n8ID15615. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/equatorial/article/view/15615. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 8 (2018): Equatorial

Section

Traduções

License

Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.