The Role of Understanding in Accepting Scientific Theories

Authors

  • Breno Pascal de Lacerda Brito Doutor em Ensino, Filosofia e História das Ciências na UFBA. Pesquisador do Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Estudos Interdisciplnares e Transdisciplinares em Ecologia e Evolução (INCT IN-TREE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n51ID17020

Keywords:

Epistemic Virtue, Epistemic Agent, Truth, Propositional, Non-Propositional

Abstract

The acceptance criterion of a scientific theory must be guided on its Understanding. That is so because the acceptance conception of scientific theories based on the expression of epistemic values is not possible, given the incommensurability issue. To solve this matter we must consider the epistemic agent competences and how these sustain its acceptance. In analyzing the choosing process of scientific theories, one must conclude that it is not associated with the mere belief formation on its empirical adequation. Thus being a process not bound to the truth, but associated with the best explanation, therefore generating the best Understanding, which is logically and conceptually, necessary aspect on acceptance of a given cognitive state consequent of an Explanation. Since the Understanding is a characteristic of a virtuous agent, we must believe that the chosen theory would be a result of the ability of a virtuous agent, and therefore a reliable theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

COHEN, L. J. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

COHEN, L. J. Why Acceptance that P Does Not Entail Belief that P. In: ENGEL, P. (Ed.). . Beliving and Accepting. Philosophi ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 2000. p. 55–65.

ELGIN, C. Z. Epistemic agency. Theory and Research in Education, v. 11, n. 2, p. 135–152, 2013.

ENGEL, P. Beliving and Accepting. First Edit ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Acedemic, 2000.

FERREIRA, T. A. DA S. Entendimento , Conhecimento e Autonomia?: Virtudes Intelectuais e o Objetivo do Ensino de Ciências. [s.l.] UFBA, 2015.

FRAASSEN, B. C. VAN. A Imagem Científica. São Paulo, SP: Fundação Editora da UNESP, 2006.

GODFREY-SMITH, P. Theory and Reality - an introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.

IVANOVA, M. Is There a Place for Epistemic Virtues in Theory Choice? In: FAIRWEATHER, A. (Ed.). . Virtue Epistemlogy Naturalized. Volume 336 ed. [s.l.] Splinger, 2014. p. 207–227.

KUHN, T. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 5a ed. São Paulo, SP: Editora Perspectiva, 1998.

LACEY, H. Is Science Value Free?? First ed. Lodon: Routledge, 1999.

LEHRER, K. Justification, Cohenrence and Knowledge. Erkenntnis, v. 50, p. 243–258, 1999.

LEHRER, K. Acceptance and Belief Revisited. In: ENGEL, P. (Ed.). . Beliving and Accepting. First Edit ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Acedemic, 2000. p. 209–220.

PRITCHARD, D. Recent work on epistemic value. American Philosophical Quartely, v. 44, n. 2, p. 85–110, 2007.

RIGGS, W. D. Understanding “Virtue” and the Virtue of Understanging. In: ZAGZEBSKI, L.; DEPAUL, M. (Eds.). . Intelectual Virtue. Paperback ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 203–226.

SAINSBURY, M. Fiction and Acceptance-Relative Truth, Belief and Assertion. n. 1, 1970.

ZAGZEBSKI, L. Recovering Understanding. In: STEUP, M. (Ed.). . Knowledge, Truth and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsability and Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. p. 235–251.

Published

30-09-2019

How to Cite

BRITO, B. P. de L. The Role of Understanding in Accepting Scientific Theories. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), [S. l.], v. 26, n. 51, p. 225–234, 2019. DOI: 10.21680/1983-2109.2019v26n51ID17020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/17020. Acesso em: 23 jul. 2024.