How a moral cognitivist can accept the Moral Twin Earth thought experiment without accepting Terence Horgan and Mark Timmons’s Non-descriptivist cognitivism

Authors

  • Monica Franco Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62ID29152

Keywords:

Moral semantics, Naturalist moral realism, Moral Twin Earth, Non-realist cognitivism

Abstract

The article aims to answer how a moral cognitivist can accept the Moral Twin Earth thought experiment without accepting Terence Horgan and Mark Timmons’s Non-descriptivist cognitivism. In order to offer the aimed answer, the semantic conclusions that these philosophers draw from the version of this thought experiment that applies to Peter Railton’s naturalist moral realism will be exposed. It will be proposed that even if a supporter of descriptivist moral cognitivism, such as Railton, accepts Horgan and Timmons’s objection, and abandons naturalist moral realism, he doesn’t need to adhere to the metaethical theory of Non-descriptivist cognitivism, and its anti-realist moral ontology. He has a way out by adhering to Derek Parfit’s Non-realist cognitivism, which, as will be argued, is possibly a superior metaethical theory to Non-descriptivist cognitivism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BLACKBURN, Simon. Essays in Quasi-Realism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

BOYD, Richard. How to be a Moral Realist. In: SAYRE-McCORD, Geoffrey (ed.) Essays in Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, p. 181-228.

BRINK, David. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

COPP, David. Realist-expressivism: A neglected option for moral realism. Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 18, n. 2, 2001, p. 1-43.

GIBBARD, Allan. Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.

GIBBARD, Allan. Thinking How to Live. Harvard University Press, 2003.

GIBBARD, Allan. Meaning and Normativity. Oxford University Press UK, 2012.

HARE, Richard. The Language of Morals. Claredon Press, Oxford, 1952.

HORGAN, Terence; TIMMONS, Mark. New Wave Moral Realism Meets Moral Twin Earth. Journal of Philosophical Research, vol. 16, 1991, p. 447-465.

HORGAN, Terry; TIMMONS, Mark. From Moral Realism to Moral Relativism in One Easy Step. Crítica, vol. 28, n. 83, 1996, p. 3-39.

HORGAN, Terry; TIMMONS, Mark. Cognitivist Expressivism. In: HORGAN, Terry; TIMMONS, Mark (eds.) Metaethics after Moore. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006a, p. 255-298.

HORGAN, Terry; TIMMONS, Mark. Morality Without Moral Facts. In: DREIER, James (ed.) Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Blackwell Publishing, 2006b, p. 220-238.

HORGAN, Terry; TIMMONS, Mark. Analytical Moral Functionalism Meets Moral Twin Earth. In: RAVENSCROFT, Ian (ed.) Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes From the Philosophy of Frank Jackson. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 221-236.

JACKSON, Frank. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

JOYCE, Richard. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

JOYCE, Richard. Moral Fictionalism. In: KALDERON, Mark (ed.) Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 287–313.

KALDERON, Mark. Moral Fictionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.

KRIPKE, Saul. Primeira Palestra. In: KRIPKE, Saul. O nomear e a necessidade. Lisboa: Gradiva, 2012, p. 67-126.

MACKIE, John. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin Books, 1977.

MOORE, George E. Principia Ethica. Tradução de Maria Manuela Rocheta Santos e Isabel Pedro dos Santos, 2ª ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1999.

PARFIT, Derek. On What Matters: Volume Three. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.

PLATÃO. A República. Introdução, tradução e notas de Maria Helena da Rocha Pereira. Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2008

PLUNKETT, David; SUNDELL, Tim. Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms. Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 13, n. 23, 2013, p. 1-37.

PUTNAM, Hilary. O significado de “significado”. Tradução de Alexandre Müller Fonseca. Cognitio-Estudos: Revista Eletrônica de Filosofia, v. 10, n. 2, 2013, p. 280-326.

RAILTON, Peter. Noncognitivism about Rationality: Benefits, Costs, and an Alternative. In: RAILTON, Peter. Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. Cambridge University Press, 2003, p. 69-84.

RAILTON, Peter. Realismo moral. In: DARWALL, Stephen; GIBBARD, Allan; RAILTON, Peter. Metaética: Algumas tendências. Série Ethica. DALL’AGNOL, Darlei (org.). Tradução de Janyne Sattler. Editora da UFSC, 2013, p. 105-158.

RAILTON, Peter. Two Sides of The Metaethical Mountain? In: SINGER, Peter (ed.). Does Anything Really Matter? Essays on Parfit on objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 35-59.

TRESAN, Jon. De Dicto Internalist Cognitivism. Noûs, vol. 40, n. 1, 2006, p. 143-165.

TRESAN, Jon. Metaethical Internalism: Another Neglected Distinction. Journal of Ethics, vol. 13, n. 1, 2009, p. 51-72.

TRESAN, Jon. Naturalistic Moral Realism and Motivational Internalism: From Negative to Positive. In: BJÖRNSSON, Gunnar; STRANDBERG, Caj; OLINDER, Ragnar F.; ERIKSSON, John; BJÖRKLUND, Fredrik (eds.). Motivational Internalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, p. 182-208.

VAN ROOJEN, Mark. Knowing enough to disagree: A new response to the moral twin earth argument. In: SHAFER-LANDAU, Russ (ed.) Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 1. Claredon Press, 2006, p. 161-194.

Published

20-11-2023

How to Cite

FRANCO, M. How a moral cognitivist can accept the Moral Twin Earth thought experiment without accepting Terence Horgan and Mark Timmons’s Non-descriptivist cognitivism. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), [S. l.], v. 30, n. 63, 2023. DOI: 10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62ID29152. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/29152. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.