STANDARDS BASED ON PRINCIPLES AND RULES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE IASB AND FASB STANDARDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2016v8n2ID8533Abstract
Amid the standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the present study aims to analyze what are the main standards that the characteristics that lead them to be more based on principles or rules are more evident. To achieve this goal, this paper compares the main standards issued by the IASB and the FASB. These two standard-setting bodies have been chosen because the current literature considers that the standards issued by the IASB and FASB are respectively based on principles and rules. This work is the result of a documentary research and content analysis reveals that the standards of the FASB, although they have a conceptual framework as a basis, have several specific characteristics that allow them to be considered as based on rules. Among the standards studied the detailing characteristic in the rules of the standards issued by the FASB and the presence of bright lines or percentage limits in the operating segments standard, provisions and leasing lead to qualify as rule-based. Since IASB standards as they are less detailed and practically do not have bright lines, leave room for greater professional judgment, that is, have more features on principles standards based.
Keywords: Principle-based standards. Rule-based standards. IFRS. US GAAP.
Downloads
References
ALEXANDER, David; JERMAKOWICZ, Eva. A true and fair view of the principles rules debate. Abacus, v. 42, n. 2, p. 132-164, 2006.
American Accounting Association (AAA). Commentary: evaluating concepts-based vs. rules-based approaches to standard setting. Financial Accounting Standards Committee. Accounting Horinzons, v. 17 n. 1, p. 73-89. mar. 2003.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). AU Section 411. The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, 2011. Disponível em: < http://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AU411.aspx>. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2014.
BENSTON, George J.; BROMWICH, Michael; WAGENHOFER, Alfred. Principles-versus Rules-Based Accounting Santandards: The FASB’s Santandard Setting Strategy. Abacus,
v. 42, n. 2, 2006.
BEUREN, Ilse Maria (Org.). Como elaborar trabalhos monográficos em contabilidade: teoria e prática. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
BRAGG, Steven M. GAAP 2011: interpretation and application of generally accepted accounting principles. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
BRASIL. Lei nº 11.638, de 28 de dezembro de 2007. Altera e revoga dispositivos da Lei no 6.404, de 15 de dezembro de 1976, e da Lei nº 6.385, de 7 de dezembro de 1976, e estende às sociedades de grande porte disposições relativas à elaboração e divulgação de demonstrações financeiras. Brasília, Diário Oficial da União, 28 dez. 2007.
BURGEMEESTRE, Brigitte; HULSTIJN, Joris; TAN, Yao-Hua. Rule-based versus Principle-based Regulatory Compliance. In: JURIX. p. 37-46. 2009.
DANTAS, José Alves et al. Normatização contábil baseada em princípios ou em regras?: Benefícios, custos, oportunidades e riscos . Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 9, p. 3-29, ago. 2010. ISSN 1982-6486. Disponível em: <http://www.revistas.usp.br/rco/ article/view/34765>. Acesso em: 07 jan. 2016. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/rco.v4i9.34765.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Conceptual Framework: Project Information Page. Last updated on July 3, 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/ FASBContent_C/ProjectUpdatePage&cid= 900000011090&pf=true>. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2014.
______. Proposal for a Principles-Based Approach to U.S. Standard Setting. No. 1125-001. 21 Out. 2002. Disponível em: <http://www.fasb.org.br>. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2014.
______. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS). Disponível em: <http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobwhere=1175820908834&blobheader=application% 2Fpdf&blobcol=urldata&blobtable=MungoBlobs>. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2014.
______. Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Financial Standards Update. Norwalk: Financial Accounting Series, 2014
GIL, Antônio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
HENDRIKSEN, Eldon S.; VAN BREDA, Michael F. Teoria da Contabilidade. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). International Accounting Standards (IAS). Jan. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.ifrs.org/IFRSs/IFRS-technical-summaries/ Pages/IFRS-and-IAS-Summaries-English-(2009).aspx>. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2015.
______. IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. IFRS. United Kingdom: Foundation Publications Department, 2014.
IUDÍCIBUS, Sérgio de; et al. Manual de contabilidade societária. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
KIRK, N. E. True and Fair View versus Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Discussion Paper Series. Massey University, School of Accountacy. New Zealand: 2001.
KPMG. IFRS em destaque 02/14. First Impressions IFRS 15: receita de contratos com clientes. Disponível em: <http://goo.gl/09lZ8s>. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2015.
NELSON, Mark W. Behavioral Evidence on the Effects of Principles- and Rules-Based Standards. Accounting Horizons, v. 17, n. 1, p. 91-104, 2003.
NIYAMA, Jorge Katsumi. Contabilidade Internacional. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
NOBES, Christopher W. Rules-Based Standards and the Lack of Principles in Accounting. Accounting Horizons, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25-34, 2005.
PAULO, Edilson; CARVALHO, Luiz Nelson Guedes de; GIRÃO, Luiz Felipe de Araújo Pontes. Algumas Questões Sobre a Normatização Contábil Baseada em Princípios, Regras e Objetivos. Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, v. 2, n. 2, p. 24-39, mai./ago. 2014.
SCHIPPER, Katherine. Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, v. 17, n. 1, p. 61-72, 2003.
SHAMROCK, Steven E. IFRS and US GAAP: a comprehensive comparison. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this magazine agree with the following terms:
Authors keep the copyrights and concede the right of its first publication to the magazine. The work piece must be simultaneously licensed on the Creative Commons Attribution Licence which allows the paper sharing, and preserves both the author identity and the right of first publication to this magazine.
Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, to not-exclusively distribution of the paper version published in this magazine (e.g.: publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with the author identity recognition and its first publication in this magazine.
Authors are permitted and stimulated to publish and distribute their papers online (e.g.: in institutional repository or on their personal webpage), considering it can generate productive alterations, as well as increase the impact and the quotations of the published paper.
Creative Commons - Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.