Escrita académica e plágio no ensino superior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/1981-1802.2020v58n56ID19986Palavras-chave:
Plágio. Escrita académica. Literacia. Ensino superior.Resumo
O plágio pode ser visto como um problema de literacia. A escrita académica é uma tarefa complexa, envolvendo competências de literacia necessárias para consultar, citar, compreender e escrever a partir de fontes. O principal objetivo deste estudo foi construir e validar um questionário destinado a avaliar as percepções de estudantes universitários acerca das suas competências de literacia. O estudo incluiu 202 estudantes. Foram feitas análises fatoriais através de análises de componentes principais, tendo-se encontrado: três fatores para a escala estratégias de compreensão (seleção, organização, integração); três para a escala estratégias de escrita(planificação, revisão e “penso-logo-escrevo”); três para a escala estratégias de escrita a partir de fontes (cópia, mosaico/paráfrase, sumário); dois para a escala estratégias de consulta(elementares, elaboradas). A escala conhecimento das normas de citação revelou uma boa fidelidade. O questionário desenvolvido é essencial para futuramente se estudarem as relações entre o plágio e as competências de literacia.
Downloads
Referências
BEREITER, Carl; SCARDAMALIA, Marlene. The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
BENNETT, Roger. Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Londres, v. 30, n. 2, p.137-162, Apr. 2005.
BRETAG, Tracey (Org.). The handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer, 2016.
BUCKINGHAM, David. Digital media literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, Oxford, v. 2, n. 1, p. 43-55, Mar. 2007.
DAVIES, Laura; HOWARD, Rebecca. Plagiarism and the Internet: Fears, facts, and pedagogies. In BRETAG, Tracey (Ed.), The handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer, 2016.
EAST, Julianne. Judging plagiarism: A problem of morality and convention. Higher Education, Londres, v. 59, p. 69–83, May. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9234-9.
GRAHAM, Steve; EARLY, Jessica; WILCOX, Kristen. Adolescent writing and writing instruction: Introduction to the special issue. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Dordrecht, v. 27, n. 6, p. 969–972, Oct. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9497-0
GULLIFER, Judith; TYSON, Graham. Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: A focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, [s. l.], v. 35, n.º 4, p.463-481, jun. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096508
HAIR, Joseph; ANDERSON, Rolph; TATHAM, Ronald; BLACK, William. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1998.
HAYES, John; FLOWER, Linda. Identifying the organisation of writing processes. In: GREGG, Lee; STEINBERG, Erwin (Eds.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980.
HOWARD, Rebecca. A plagiarism pentimento. Journal of Teaching Writing, Indianapolis, v. 11, n. 2, p.233–245, Jan. 1992.
HOWARD, Rebecca. Plagiarism in higher education: An academic literacies issue? Introduction. In: BRETAG, Tracey (Ed.). The handbook of academic integrity . Singapore: Springer. 2016.
HOWARD, Rebecca; ROBILLARD, Amy (Eds.). Pluralizing, plagiarism: Identities, contexts, pedagogies. New York: Heinemann-Boynton/Cook. 2008.
HOWARD, Rebecca; SERVISS, Tricia; RODRIGUE, Tanya. Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing & Pedagogy, Lacey, v. 2, n. 2, p. 177-192, May. 2010.
IAVE. Relatório nacional 2016 e 2017. Provas de aferição. Ensino Básico. Lisboa: Instituto de Avaliação Educacional. 2018.
JAMIESON, Sandra (2013). Reading and engaging sources: What students' use of sources reveals about advanced reading skills across the disciplines. Disponível em: http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/reading/jamieson.cfm. Acesso em: 3 mar. 2019.
JAMIESON, Sandra. The evolution of the Citation Project. Developing a pilot study from local to translocal. In: SERVISS, Tricia; JAMIESON, Sandra (Eds.). The evolution of the Citation Project: Lessons learned from a multi-year, multi-study. Utah: State University Press. 2018.
JAMIESON, Sandra; HOWARD, Rebecca. (2011). Unraveling the citation trail. Project information literacy smart talk, n.º 8. Disponível em: http://projectinfolit.org/smart-talks/item/110-sandra-jamieson-rebecca-moore-howard-smart-talk. Acesso em: 4 abr. 2019.
JAMIESON, Sandra; HOWARD, Rebecca. Rethinking the relationship between plagiarism and academic integrity. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education/Revue Internationale des Technologies en Pédagogie Universitaire, v.16, n. 2, 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2019-v16n2-07. Online edition published September 5, 2019.
JOINT INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE AND THE BRITISH LIBRARY (2012, June 28). Research of tomorrow: The research behaviour of generation Y doctoral students. Disponível em: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6943/75c5ea6d948a59e46d3a614ad57b9e163d86.pdf. Acesso em: 6 maio. 2019.
KELLOGG, Ronald. Writing method and productivity of science and engineering faculty. Research in Higher Education, Dordrecht, v. 25, n. 2, p. 147–163, June. 1986.
KELLOGG, Ronald. Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, Antuérpia, v.1, n. 1, p. 1-26, June. 2008.
KINTSCH, Walter. Learning and constructivism. In: TOBIAS, Sigmund; DUFFY, Thomas (Eds.). Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? New York: Routledge. 2009. p. 223-241.
ODENA, Oscar; BURGESS, Hilary. How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, [s. l.], v. 42, n. 3, p. 572-590, July. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598
PECORARI, Diane. Academic writing and plagiarism. A linguist analysis. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. 2008.
PECORARI, Diane. Plagiarism, international students, and the second-language writer. In: BRETAG, Tracey (Ed.). The handbook of academic integrity. Singapore: Springer. 2016. p. 537-550.
ROUET, Jean-François. The skills of document use. From text comprehension to Web-based learning. New York: Routledge. 2006.
TORRANCE, Mark; THOMAS, Glyn; Robinson, Elizabeth. Individual diferences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: A longitudinal study. Higher Education, Londres, v. 39, n. 4, p. 181-200, June. 2000.
VAN DIJK, Teun; KINTSCH, Walter. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press. 1983.
WEBER-WULFF, Debora. False feathers: A perspective on academic plagiarism. Berlin: Springer. 2014.
YOSHIMURA, Fumiko. Japanese University students’ task representations of paraphrasing and their experience with it. Tohoku Gakuin University Review: Essays and Studies in English Language and Literature, Sendai, v. 99, p. 1-21, Mar. 2015.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
À Revista Educação em Questão ficam reservados os direitos autorais no tocante a todos os artigos nela publicados.
A Revista Educação em Questão reserva-se ao direito de não publicar artigos e resenhas de mesma autoria (ou em co-autoria) em intervalos inferiores há 1 (um) ano.
