Carl Schmitt and post-marxism: The Chantal Mouffe case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21680/1983-2109.2022v29n60ID27128Keywords:
Radical democracy, Antagonism, AgonismAbstract
The article investigates the proposal for re-reading the theory of democracy and the concept of the political made by Chantal Mouffe. The objective is to analyze the author's arguments and the rehabilitation of the theme of conflict as constitutive of democracy. After the consensual turn, rational procedures and principles began to govern the institution of politics through deliberative conceptions about democracy, marked by the neutralization of conflict and identification between politics and morality. Against this movement, Mouffe promotes an unusual encounter between post-structuralist Marxism and some central theses of Carl Schmit's political theory. In contrast to the understanding of politics as an antagonism between friends/enemies, Mouffe proposes a model of adversarial agonism, which, according to her, can take the form of a liberal democracy. We intend to examine his proposal and discuss whether it actually surpasses Schmitt's critique of liberalism.
Downloads
References
BENHABIB, Seyla. ’Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic legitimacy', In: Seyla Senhabib (ed.), Democracy and difference., Princeton, 1996.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1992.
IBRAHIMY, Babrak. Schmitt and Mouffe on the ‘Ontology’ of the Political. Acta Politologica 6, 3, 2014, p. 310-325.
LACLAU, E; MOUFFE, C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. Verso: London, 1985.
MOUFFE, Chantal. “Democratic politics today”. In: MOUFFE, C. (ed.) Dimensions of radical democracy: pluralism, citizenship, community. London: Verso, 1992.
MOUFFE, Chantal. The Return of the Political. London; New York: Verso, 1993.
MOUFFE, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy”. In: MOUFFE, C. (Ed.), The Challenge Carl Schmitt, New York: Verso, 1999a, p. 1-6.
MOUFFE, Chantal. “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy”. In: MOUFFE, C. (Ed.), The Challenge Carl Schmitt, New York: Verso, 1999b, p. 38-53.
MOUFFE, Chantal. The Democratic Paradox. London/New York: Verso, 2000.
MOUFFE, Chantal. On the Political. London: Routledge, 2005.
MOUFFE, Chantal. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso, 2013.
MENDONÇA, Daniel. “Teorizando o agonismo: crítica a um modelo incompleto”. Sociedade e Estado, v. 25, n.3, 2010, p. 479-497.
MIGUEL, Luis Felipe. “Consenso e Conflito na Teoria Democrática: para além do ‘Agonismo’”. In: Lua Nova, São Paulo, 92, 2014, p. 13-43.
SCHMITT, Carl. Die geistesgeschichtliche Lage des heutigen Parlamentarismus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1922.
SCHMITT, Carl. Der Hüter der Verfassung. Tübingen: J.C.B.Mohr, 1931.
SCHMITT, Carl. Der Begriff des Politischen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1932.
SCHMITT, Carl. “Die Wendung zum totalen Staat”, in: Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar, Genf, Versailles 1923-1939. 3a ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1994.
SCHMITT, Carl. Legalität und Legitimität. 8a ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Deyvison Lima, José Maria Arruda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.