DO ORAL ANTISEPTICS USED IN THE DENTAL ROUTINE HAVE ANTI-VIRAL EFFICACY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF IN VITRO STUDIES

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21680/2446-7286.2024v10n1ID34126

Resumo

Introduction: Mouthwashes play an important role in the dental clinic, but their role on viruses requires investigation. Objective: to review in vitro studies to identify the effect of different mouthwashes on the main viruses associated with routine dental care. Methodology: The following databases were searched in September 2023: PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases; the Cochrane Library and the Virtual Health Library (VHL); and grey literature. In vitro studies that used mouthwashes to reduce the viral load were selected. The PICOS strategy was considered to define eligibility criteria: the Population (viruses involved in the etiology of oral infection), the Intervention (oral antiseptics), the appropriate comparator (positive and negative controls), the Outcomes of interest (reduction of viral load) and the Study design (in vitro studies). Results: Considering the eligibility criteria, 19 articles were included in this review. The efficacy of povidone-iodine (PVP-I), chlorhexidine, Listerine®, essential oils, and cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) rinses were investigated. PVP-I (0.23%) had its effects mainly associated with coronaviruses SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), demonstrating a significant reduction in viral load after 15 seconds of exposure. Chlorhexidine (0.05%; 0.1% and 0.5%) was ineffective against adenovirus, poliovirus, and rhinovirus respiratory viruses. Listerine® demonstrated superior efficacy against HSV-1 and 2 viruses and influenza A, and cetylpyridine chloride also demonstrated virucidal activity against influenza A. Conclusions: The type, concentration, and time of exposure to antiseptics varied between studies. PVP-I and chlorhexidine digluconate were the most studied substances, but in general, PVP-I was more effective in reducing viral titers, especially concerning coronaviruses. Other antiseptics such as CPC, H2O2 and Listerine® have also shown significant reduction in viral load, but this is a limited number of studies.

Keywords: Mouthwashes; Virus; Infection Control; Antiviral Agents.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Jaiane Carmélia Monteiro Viana, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Cirurgiã-Dentista pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN

Guilherme Carlos Beiruth Freire, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Especialista em Periodontia, Mestre em Ciências Odontológicas e Pós-graduando a nível de Doutorado em Ciências Odontológicas, com área de concentração em Clínicas Odontológicas pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN.

Carlos Eduardo de Paiva Campos Nogueira Simão, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Pós- graduando a nível de mestrado em Ciências Odontológicas, com área de concentração em Clínicas Odontológicas pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN

Rayanne Karina Silva Cruz, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Mestre em Saúde Coletiva e Doutora em Ciências Odontológicas, com área de concentração em Clínicas Odontológicas pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN.

Bruno César de Vasconcelos Gurgel, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Especialista, Mestre e Doutor em Periodontia pela Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba - FOP, Unicamp. Professor titular do Departamento de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN

Downloads

Publicado

29-04-2024

Como Citar

CARMÉLIA MONTEIRO VIANA, J. C. M.; FREIRE, G. C. B.; SIMÃO, C. E. de P. C. N.; CRUZ, R. K. S.; GURGEL, B. C. de V. DO ORAL ANTISEPTICS USED IN THE DENTAL ROUTINE HAVE ANTI-VIRAL EFFICACY? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF IN VITRO STUDIES. Revista Ciência Plural, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 1, p. 1–26, 2024. DOI: 10.21680/2446-7286.2024v10n1ID34126. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/34126. Acesso em: 4 nov. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Revisão Sistemática